Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
mark 1 v mark 2
#1
putting prejudice aside, ie; accoirding to what you own

which is best boxeye or foxeye?  What would you buy?

and what would you buy if you had just £1500, no more

love to know with reasons as relevant,

like are they both as comfortable over long distance  Smile

Reply
#2
Better headlights on a foxeye, and the largest fuel tank.
Other than the shape of the fairing the bikes are much the same I would've thought, apart from the odd tweak here and there.


http://foc-u.co.uk/?topic=34.0
More people are born because of alcohol than will ever die from it.
Reply
#3
useful link - thanks
Reply
#4
Black bikes tend to be faster too.  :lol
More people are born because of alcohol than will ever die from it.
Reply
#5
It was the look of the boxeye which originally attracted me to the Fazer, but when the opportunity to buy my foxeye came along it was too good a bike to resist regarding condition & mileage etc...I would have thought comfort over a long distance was pretty much the same, but I've not owned a boxeye so can't speak from experience.
Reply
#6
To be honest I don't think there's much between them. Personally I'd go for a decent foxeye with low milage, the best you can find for your budget. Improved tank, light, fairing, hazard switch and mirrors. Most parts are interchangeable so plenty of spares about. I'm not biased, I've got a boxeye. To my mind the larger tank is the winning feature, everything else you can change/live with.
Treat everything in life the way a dog would- if you can't eat it or foc it, forget it.
Reply
#7
(11-08-15, 09:17 PM)celticdog link Wrote: To be honest I don't think there's much between them. Personally I'd go for a decent foxeye with low milage, the best you can find for your budget. Improved tank, light, fairing, hazard switch and mirrors. Most parts are interchangeable so plenty of spares about. I'm not biased, I've got a boxeye. To my mind the larger tank is the winning feature, everything else you can change/live with.


You can put the bigger tank on your bike!
I have hazards on my bike too.
More people are born because of alcohol than will ever die from it.
Reply
#8
thanks guys  Smile
Reply
#9
It was purely a looks thing for me and I prefer the slightly more sculpted tank and the shape of the foxeye. I feel the box eye's are looking a bit dated but each to their own. I would base your purchase more on mileage, service history, condition etc..

Chris
[Image: 208008.png]
It wouldn't be fun if it was easy, I just wish it wasn't this much fun.
Reply
#10
For £1500 I would buy red Foxeye because I like it more  :lol
Adrian Monk: Unless I'm wrong, which, you know, I'm not.

[Image: 606131.png]
Reply
#11
I don't got a clock on my box eye
I don't do rain or threat there of. dry rider only with no shame.
Reply
#12
(11-08-15, 07:31 PM)twosheds link Wrote: putting prejudice aside, ie; accoirding to what you own

which is best boxeye or foxeye?  What would you buy?

and what would you buy if you had just £1500, no more

love to know with reasons as relevant,

like are they both as comfortable over long distance  Smile


I'd seriously go and have a look at the blue boxeye you commented on in the for sale section. Its a cracking looking bike with a nice custom seat. It's only 2 litres shy of a foxeye tank, its got HID lights which beat the standard foxeye by a mile, heated grips etc and it's had a lot of tlc. Just my 2p tho.
Those are my principles...if you don't like them I have others.
Reply
#13
thanks again all  Smile
Reply
#14
Looking at blue bikes then are we  :lol


...and a slip on can, rear hugger, fender extender etc. Not far from you either  :rolleyes


Keep us posted and good luck  :thumbup
Those are my principles...if you don't like them I have others.
Reply
#15
I've had both (now with Foxeye).  There isn't a lot between them, better headlights and bigger tank on Foxeye, as has already been said.

Foxeyes are more expensive, partly as they are newer, partly as they are perceived as better.  You'll get a better condition box eye for the same money, unless you get lucky and find a bargain fox.


[Image: 138790.png]
Reply
#16
Boxeye from the for sale section, It looks very nice!  8)

2001 Fazer 600 in very good order. Recent new chain, front & rear sprockets, braded rear lines, new R1 rear suspension, oil replaced in front suspension, heated grips, crash bars (never used) recent full service, HID headlight conversion, plenty of tread on both tyers. Will have 12 months MOT to new owner. 26800 miles, after market levers, top box included. Located near to Huntingdon 1 mile off A14

£1500.00

Any questions please email pilot.pat@btinternet.com 



* 007.JPG (3526.7 kB, 2448x3264 - viewed 6 times.)
Treat everything in life the way a dog would- if you can't eat it or foc it, forget it.
Reply
#17
If there are two options, choose option 3.
The original Boxeye 1.0 is cheaper and a film icon according to Kill Bill.  Furthermore, it's done a comfirmed 104mph lap @ the TT so has some racing pedigree.
The Boxeye 1.5 (2000-2001) added a larger fuel capacity, preload-adjustable fork caps and better pillion provision (footrest hangers & pillion seat).
Foxeyes appear to be a facelift model just to stay trendy, but with an even bigger fuel tank & better headlights.

IMO the Boxeye 1.5 (such as the one mentioned above) offers the best price/performance combination, providing you don't mind the retro look (which will come back round again in a few years)
Reply
#18
So that's 3 of us nudging you towards the blue Boxeye up for sale - cracking bike, get over there  :lol
Those are my principles...if you don't like them I have others.
Reply
#19
heres a nice one for less and open to offers..


[Image: %24_57.JPG]




http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Yamaha-Fazer-F...1ea298e196
If I wanted to make a life-long career out of
working with the mentally retarded I would
have opened a Harley Davidson Dealership!
Reply
#20
That's a really nicely done naked conversion! Like the infill panels at the front of the tank.

Chris
[Image: 208008.png]
It wouldn't be fun if it was easy, I just wish it wasn't this much fun.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: