This is one for all of the bored masochists out there. Last weekend I got my old down pipes off nice and easy. They have been blowing for some time so I bit the bullet and got some stainless motads but when they arrived for some reason I just wasn't really that impressed. So I set about refurbing my originals and have left the stainless in my room for now. I took the original pipes to a local garage to get the worst bit welded up which he has done a really good job of and it didn't cost much at all. I then today set about the task of prepping the down pipes for painting:
First I washed them off thoroughly using a pressure washer. Not normally advised but fine as they weren't on the bike, was powerful enough to take a small amount of the paint off.
Sprayed on some muc-off degreaser and let it set for a few minutes, then brushed it in with a stiff brush.
Rinsed off the residue with the pressure washer and left to dry.
Used 80 grit aluminium oxide paper that I got from Halfords and cut it into 8 A5 strips, then sanded like a furious ape for about 2-3 hours.
Halfway through I flipped the pipes over and degreased and pressure washed them again.
More sanding
I then went over the worst bits with a wire brush drill attachment, this created a few more holes but I will take the pipes back down to the garage to be re welded in those areas. At least I exposed them now so that they can be reinforced before putting them on the bike as weak as they were and having them become holes in no time.
All in all it was quite an effort and took a fair few hours of hard work to complete but I feel like it was definitely worth it. I will put up some photos when they are completed after they have been welded and I've finished painting them.
Here are some pics, they look better in the flesh and you can't really see how smooth they are now but it is a huge improvement on what they were like before believe me.
Also for anyone interested here are the original downpipes and Motads right next to each other, they are definitely not identical in several places. Plus something I am very much looking forward to when it is finally all back together on the bike!
Well all im saying is that ive read well enough the stuff..that the originals are the best etc etc.
I've replaced mine with Cristos stainless set & all i can say is there's really not much difference except they look much better & sound a bit beefier & they are both good things.
Fair play for trying to keep the originals going but it is really just delaying the inevitable.
Easiest way to go fast........don't buy a blue bike
I have Motads too. I think the main issue with them is the lack of back pressure in comparison to the oem set. You can see how much narrower the oem pipe is where the 4 pipes collect. I know a couple of people on here have sleeved them down - Paul reported on this in detail. I was just wondering about doing the same soon.
Can't really pin it down to one answer to be honest, I guess I rushed into buying them and when they arrived I just thought in all honesty I don't really need these. I did a lot of research before buying them, went through loads of info and reviews on the old and new forum about what people thought of aftermarket stainless pipes and which to buy. Sorry if this offends anyone but the general consensus I found was that the motads were the best, however there were people who were having issues with fitment or just poor running in comparison to the original pipes. Skilled mechanics were also commenting that dyno readings showed the original pipes offered the best running, especially in the mid range, as they are after all designed by Yamaha for the bike. Obviously the fact they corrode very easily isn't ideal but hopefully this time my preparation and painting will be good enough to keep the rust away for a decent amount of time.
I asked a load of questions to motad who gave me great customer service. When they arrived I compared them side by side with my original pipes. They were not the exact same, especially where the 4 pipes join to 2 then one and go to the outlet pipe which was one of the main questions I asked and was reassured it was all the same as the original. I was quite put off by that, also the fact they weren't as good a finish as I was hoping made me decide to change my mind about scrapping my old pipes which leaves me where I am today. If the remaining holes can be welded which I'm very sure they can be, I am definitely putting my originals back on. Yes it was a ball ache preparing and cleaning them and no doubt painting them will be hassle too but if the bike keeps all of its mid range power then its worth it because revving the tits off of it everywhere isn't my riding style. If I can sell them and get back the £150 I spent I can put that towards braided lines and renthals.
My dad mentioned "delaying the inevitable" and he was a bit surprised at my decision too, but I think I've justified my reasons for doing it. I am painting them myself as well so all I'm getting the mechanic to do is the welding. I've been quoted £30-40 and he's only done the one area so far, I didn't get a picture but its the black area where the strengthening plate is just before the outlet pipe it was completely riddled with holes so he removed it and re welded in new plating. The rest are just a few small holes and I want him to reinforce all of the double skinned pipes meet the single skinned rear section.
I read about sleeving down the stainless pipes but I really couldn't tell what it involved or how I would go about it? Refurbing the originals I've done before I just rushed it and didn't do enough so I'm having to do it all over again annoyingly but this time its a much more thorough job.
As you say whatever works best for you & thats the bonus of the foc-u that we can all read & make our own choices.
But [size=78%]back to my personal opinion or theory or whatever..[/size]
[size=78%]Does this extra mid range on the originals actually equate to much whatsoever in real life, i dont think it does.[/size]
[size=78%]If you aren't gunning it anyway then you can instantly gain more mid range by twisting the throttle further.[/size]
Easiest way to go fast........don't buy a blue bike
26-01-14, 01:33 AM (This post was last modified: 26-01-14, 01:36 AM by Fuzzy.)
I think it's pretty straight forward, a matter of inserting a smaller diameter pipe into that area of the downpipes. By all means the Motads are not bad - I went to PDQ last week and when I said I had Motads Nick there went "good", so I reckon they're some of the better of the ss pipes. FYI, my bike did a smidge under 80bhp and a smidge under 41 lb/ft. Full Motad system and K&N filter, 46k miles on the clock. Not super impressive but that was before fettling and is about right for a bike of it's age/mileage. Having said all that, the FZS600 which made the most power 86.?bhp was completely standard according to his records but was a Foxeye with much less miles.
Anyway, I haven't really looked at my own pipes recently but what Paul describes in the above link makes sense to me. I think I'll give it a go this year and see if it makes a difference.
Why dont you fit the Motads to see if you notice a change in performance from your oem set?
There's no need to have any concerns that the motads are different from oem where the pipes join at the collector box, its all the other dimensions that matter when coming to fitting!
(26-01-14, 01:33 AM)Fuzzy link Wrote: I think it's pretty straight forward, a matter of inserting a smaller diameter pipe into that area of the downpipes. By all means the Motads are not bad - I went to PDQ last week and when I said I had Motads Nick there went "good", so I reckon they're some of the better of the ss pipes. FYI, my bike did a smidge under 80bhp and a smidge under 41 lb/ft. Full Motad system and K&N filter, 46k miles on the clock. Not super impressive but that was before fettling and is about right for a bike of it's age/mileage. Having said all that, the FZS600 which made the most power 86.?bhp was completely standard according to his records but was a Foxeye with much less miles.
Anyway, I haven't really looked at my own pipes recently but what Paul describes in the above link makes sense to me. I think I'll give it a go this year and see if it makes a difference.
Why dont you fit the Motads to see if you notice a change in performance from your oem set?
Nick makes it all look a bit too easy when he strips a bike down, but i like the way he sits next to you on the settee in the waiting area with engine parts on his lap showing you what was wrong or what he's gonna do next!
Here's my dyno graph before i had the K&N put in, and although i have replacement shiny downpipes even Nick couldn't tell me what brand they were so i simply don't know?
More people are born because of alcohol than will ever die from it.
I've fitted a set of Delkevic downpipes, not really noticed any difference in performance, but had to take a hefty file to the centre stand as it fouled the collecter area when used. That is with original silencer fitted.
26-01-14, 06:05 PM (This post was last modified: 26-01-14, 06:30 PM by Fuzzy.)
(26-01-14, 02:55 PM)darrsi link Wrote: I have had it done again since but forgot to ask for a print-out. :rolleyes
I was comparing your dyno results with mine earlier and noticed that dip @ 7K on yours. Mine is down on power in comparison but the curves seem a little smoother. Air/fuel trace was alright too - I was expecting worse tbh but in the end all it needed was a carb balance and a small pilot mixture adjustment.
Despite what I said earlier, having looked at my dyno sheet more closely, I think I probably won't bother with the sleeving down business after all. It looks healthy enough. The mid-range, which is supposed to suffer with aftermarket ss pipes, looks ok. My Motads/Venoms have balance pipes - Darssi, do yours? If not, maybe that would explain your 7k dip.
I'll do another dyno session someday, if the power figures drop further I might start thinking of ways to get it a bit higher.
PS. Interesting - my bike has approx 5hp more than yours @ 7k, and yours has approx 5hp more @ peak. There is definitely more power from your engine after 10k, before that they seem quite similar apart from the dip. All academic of course, conditions incl changes in dyno software can effect results but still interesting!
Two things to consider, firstly i think i had what i would class as a moody Hi-Flo air filter in back then which i don't believe worked the way it should.
It was quite new too but it never felt right so i bought the K&N soon after.
Secondly i had my SP Engineering stubby can on as well, and i was never 100% with the way the bike ran with it on, which is why i prefer the Quill can as a better all rounder.
I've also had a replacement TPS and i balanced the carbs myself since then so i would imagine a reading now would be a bit better?
More people are born because of alcohol than will ever die from it.
![[Image: 300668.png]](https://badges.fuelly.com/images/sig-us/300668.png)
