01-06-16, 10:00 AM
(01-06-16, 08:28 AM)JoeRock link Wrote: [quote author=darrsi link=topic=20139.msg233295#msg233295 date=1464756710]Glad to hear it works ok. In the end I chickened out and went for dot 4 :\
[quote author=celticdog link=topic=20139.msg233280#msg233280 date=1464724091]
[quote author=kgjersda link=topic=20139.msg233064#msg233064 date=1464467705]
The guy from the other thread here![]()
The brakes are working 100%, no problems with DOT 5.1 so far (800km). I'd like a little more bite from the brakes, but thats probably just worn out pads.
I had no real reason to use 5.1 over DOT 4. Just wanted to try it out.
But I'm going to use it on the rear when I next change the pads

[/quote]
Do you really want 'more bite' on the rear?
I can understand trying it out at the front, but personally i wouldn't bother using it on the rear just for every day riding.
[/quote]
Brake fluid will make sod all difference to the bite (comparing 5.1 to 4, I don't mean comparing old to new fluid). Main difference is 5.1 has a higher boiling point, hence why its used on race bikes - you'll never get near the temperatures needed to boil fluid on the road unless you have a serious issue with your braking system. Downside is as pointed out its considerably more hygroscopic so will need bleeding more frequently, which is a bit pointless on a road bike too!
[/quote]
Sounds like unnecessary hard work to me, for no real gain at all.
More people are born because of alcohol than will ever die from it.