11-02-14, 06:21 AM
(10-02-14, 07:16 PM)AndyL link Wrote: I had a brief chat with a solicitor. In short they said as the claim isn't for injuries it wouldn't be cost effective to use them but did say something similarHope so, worth fighting for, as we tend to be treated as the underdogs, game of bluff and counter bluff, trying to persuade you to back off.
A. The drivers version of events doesn't seem as credible due to the damage
B. I didn't fall off which supports me either not moving or at least moving very slowly
C. There should be a greater responsability on the car driver to ensure that the main road is clear of other traffic then there is for a vehicle on the main road to allow for traffic crossing give way lines.
They did say it was unlikely I'd get 100% but I wonder if I can swing this a bit more in my favour
[/size][/color]Over the years have battled on through a few claims when I have been knocked off and always won through, though sometimes it felt as if I was battering my head against a brick wall! :wall
Age is a question of mind over matter, if you don't mind, it doesn't matter!
If I had a brain I would be dangerous
If I had a brain I would be dangerous