Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
helmet strength ?
#21
With you on that one FAZERSHARP....next test will be full frontal on the chin guard....if I can hold it...
One, is never going to be enough.....
Reply
#22
Is16, same test, no cracking on outside or damage to paint, think it might be a different finish, inner poly is damaged, this lid has the internal tinted visor, the mechanism on top of the lid went on the second test and has left a square hole where you can see the poly inner, wonder if this is a weak point ......


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
       
One, is never going to be enough.....
Reply
#23
Full frontal test......shoei......wow, that was easy, just the weight of the hammer as test one, broke clean through, inner and outer.....


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
       
One, is never going to be enough.....
Reply
#24
Side test.....zf7.....again another clean break, same test, just the weight of the hammer, thought it would be stronger than that as a lot newer than the shoei....


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
One, is never going to be enough.....
Reply
#25
So that just leaves the is16, a tough flexable cookie, no cracks on the outside of this one yet which is reassuring as I now have the later FG15  Smile

the main difference ive noticed in these tests is the flexabilty in the outer hard shell of the is16, the newest lid at only 3 years old, the two older lids were easy to break from the side and front but this could be down to age.


Got to finish this test and the is16....but how......its over to you foccers...........................name the test  Wink


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
One, is never going to be enough.....
Reply
#26
I have to say you are doing it all wrong, you need to get a camera and be on the bike whilst testing the helmet  :pokefun

Like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63FBnp4mJR8
Adrian Monk: Unless I'm wrong, which, you know, I'm not.

[Image: 606131.png]
Reply
#27
(31-08-15, 06:54 PM)red98 link Wrote: So that just leaves the is16, a tough flexable cookie, no cracks on the outside of this one yet which is reassuring as I now have the later FG15  Smile

the main difference ive noticed in these tests is the flexabilty in the outer hard shell of the is16, the newest lid at only 3 years old, the two older lids were easy to break from the side and front but this could be down to age.


Got to finish this test and the is16....but how......its over to you foccers...........................name the test  Wink


Get Exupnut to wear it and crash into a wall or lend it to Christo, I'm sure he'll find a convoluted way to test it
Reply
#28
As has already been said, drop that safe on it.... you never know it might open and we might find out the contents!
Money doesn't buy happiness, but it buys beer, and that helps!
Reply
#29
Grinder to replicate sliding down the road.
FOCing down under.......dodging vacant Skippy's.
Reply
#30
Yep.....think its got to be an abrasive test, a woodworker by trade so I have access to a good range of machinery, in particular a "open drum sander" 60 grit paper is the roughest I have but should be good enough, a timed test parhaps starting at 3 or 4 seconds .......will post piccies of said machine.....
One, is never going to be enough.....
Reply
#31
Oh dear Red,,get a life  !!!




start poking nails in the tyres to test their strength
An ageing test pilot for home grown widgets that may fail at anytime.
Reply
#32
Doing this so you dont have to mr willy  Wink....better than being  a couch potato watching the box...............
One, is never going to be enough.....
Reply
#33
Shots fired, shots fired!!

:lurk
[Image: 242673.png] [Image: 174802.png]
Reply
#34
I think you just had a bored to death moment.

Go clean the windows ,lol
An ageing test pilot for home grown widgets that may fail at anytime.
Reply
#35
Helmet strength checker
http://sharp.direct.gov.uk/news/4-septem...et-ratings
An ageing test pilot for home grown widgets that may fail at anytime.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: