The rear tyre on my Sprint is needing replaced, it's a Pirelli Angel st, I don't really like the feel of it but it was on the bike when I purchased it and was too good to throw off, my question is can I leave the half decent Angel on the front and fit a Michelin on the rear or am I better to replace both to Michelin, my brother says he read somewhere that I must have same tyre front and rear but I don't know so need your input.
If you worried about falling off your bike, you'd never get on.
I've done this a few times with various brands, doesn't seem to make a difference imho.
Freck is pretty much spot on with the psychological side of it.
Shouldn't be a problem.
Stop polishing it and ride the bloody thing!!
You guys may be right that it is psychological, but i have the same tyres on all my bikes. Head thoughts when riding are is the front as warm as the back etc.... :eek
If it's broken, it's not fixed.
I've NEVER had the same tyres on any of my bikes before.
I've always read plenty of reviews before buying and over many years have found that sometimes one will out perform the other so i've always mixed them up.
In fact now is the first time i've ever had the same brand of tyres on my bike, both Bridgestone, but a BT023 on the front and a T30 on the rear.
My mate lived in Germany for a few years recently and over there it is actually law to have the same tyres front and back.
The PR3 seems to be the most rated tyre of choice on here as a very decent all rounder with longevity as well.
More people are born because of alcohol than will ever die from it.
I remember talk of the PR4 last year I think - are the PR3's still preferred?
Matching tyres are exaclty that - matching. They have been designed to work together optimally.
That said, I don't think that mixing them up would make that much difference to most people and/or normal road riding. Track days or overriding for conditions and it may be more noticeable.
Ultimately, it's up to you. If you are happy and comfortable mixing them, then go for it. If you'd prefer matching, then you'll have to pay more to change them both.
(29-06-15, 01:00 PM)Jamieg285 link Wrote: Matching tyres are exaclty that - matching. They have been designed to work together optimally.
That said, I don't think that mixing them up would make that much difference to most people and/or normal road riding. Track days or overriding for conditions and it may be more noticeable.
Ultimately, it's up to you. If you are happy and comfortable mixing them, then go for it. If you'd prefer matching, then you'll have to pay more to change them both.
They may be classed as matched by the manufacturers, but it's the reviews I take notice of.
On my last bike I had a tyre on the rear which had positive high reviews but the matching front got terrible reviews, from wearing unevenly to being shite in wet weather, and it was consistent wherever I looked.
So it makes sense to me to buy tyres which have individual higher reviews and are a good all rounder, regardless of whether they end up being matched or not.
Always worked well for me.
More people are born because of alcohol than will ever die from it.
Manufacturers will tell you anything to make their product look good, but with tyres for instance they simply cannot produce the same riding conditions EVERY day as if you were using them yourself.
This is why bikers reviews count so much.
People will generally be quite honest about things, if the product is good or bad they will blatantly say so.
More people are born because of alcohol than will ever die from it.
Cheers guys, have decided it would probably be safer (in my head) to buy a pair, I had Michelin Pilot power 2ct's on the Fazer and really liked them, so will give them a try on the Sprint.
If you worried about falling off your bike, you'd never get on.
I have a Maxxis front & Pirelli Angel St on the rear on my 600 I very comfortable with mixing tyre brands.