Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The pathetic mods and attitudes at TV Licence Resistence Forum
#1
Having been legally licence free for nearly 2 years I became a member of the TV Licence Resistence Forum as I, like many others, was annoyed at the TVL for refusing to believe I did not need a TVL and the constant hassle by post and door step visits they carried out.

I now need a TVL as I have moved and I'm in a house which has a TV set up to receive live TV broadcasts (the only reason you ever need one), so on the TVLR forum I advised that I had to buy a licence (they repeatedly advise members they do not advocate evasion, only LLF) and the problems that I was having trying to buy a licence for cash.

I did not want to give TVL my credit or debit card details, neither did i want to set up a direct debit, I just wanted to walk into a Post Office and buy a licence for my home (not possible as PO do not sell them anymore).

I then found out that I had to use Paypoint which I tried to do and was told by 3 different shops that I was not in the system - why would I be, I did not need a licence before? And that they could not sell me one unless I gave my details to TVL who would arrange it on line or over the phone.

This meant back to the option of debit/credit card or DD agreement which I don't want to do, why should TVL have the ability to automatically charge me each year when my circumstances might have changed or I might be a bit skint when they decide to take the money and cost me bank charges?

So I decided to report this on the TVLR forum - I have never seen such a pathetic cyber bullying reaction in my life, first I was ridiculed for having to buy a licence, then I was told as a BBC funder (depite my stating that I was buying it as I had to because I now lived with a TV watcher) I was not welcome, then I started collecting negative reputation points.

I put my points across clearly and stated that I just wanted to ask why the TVL has such an aversion to people wanting to pay cash for their TVL, I asked why they were being so negative and pointed out that their refusal to discuss anything other than being legally licence free completely undermines the site and the ability of it to spread the word.

Also I pointed out that just because I had to buy a TVL in line with their own advice it didn't mean I supported the BBC TVL and my views had not changed, if the forum was exclusively for legally licence free people then how could they expand knowledge and membership?

Next thing I'm banned and the two threads where the bullying by the mods was taking place were removed, admittedly I did state that I was leaving the site anyway as it was clear I was no longer welcome and in my last post tell the main mod to stick his site where the sun doesn't shine (those exact words, no swearing allowed on TVLR forum), but come on, this is pathetic cyber bullying at it's worst, do these people have no life at all and spend their entire time making 'friends' in cyber space to gang up on others or watching catch up TV on iplayer?

I used to recommend TVLR forum, now I have to say avoid them as the only information you ever need with the TVL is if you don't need one do not have any contact with TVL, if they visit say nothing and close the door on them and if they write throw it in the bin where it belongs - you don't need a load of impotent bullying cyber geeks to tell you that and jump on you if you dare discuss anything other than being legally licence free.
Reply
#2
I can feel a foc-u solidarity moment coming along here..

What about we all sign up to their site and start discussing cyber bullying amongst ourselves and see how long it takes them to get the ban hammer out, might even take a few of them with us?
Reply
#3
lol hhmm License - l like that word.  To own a tv is a privilege dont think it has anything todo with competency tho (well you need to work the remote  :lol ).


hehe
Reply
#4
The people on that forum sound like a bunch of twats tbh  :rolleyes

(10-10-12, 01:54 PM)grum_pe1@hotmail.com link Wrote: lol hhmm License - l like that word.  To own a tv is a privilege dont think it has anything todo with competency tho (well you need to work the remote  :lol ).


hehe
Why would it have anything to do with competency?  You don't have to take a TV Test before you get a TV licence  :b  It's a licence to receive the TV broadcast.
Reply
#5
(10-10-12, 01:54 PM)grum_pe1@hotmail.com link Wrote: lol hhmm License - l like that word.  To own a tv is a privilege dont think it has anything todo with competency tho (well you need to work the remote  :lol ).

A license is a certificate of granted permission, not a verification of competancy to do something.
Reply
#6
Perhaps we should really confuse things and ask if we should continue to use our TV's if we lost our licence?
Reply
#7
(10-10-12, 02:19 PM)Chillum link Wrote: Perhaps we should really confuse things and ask if we should continue to use our TV's if we lost our licence?
:lol :lol
Reply
#8
Perhaps they should have a provisional TV licence?  Then you'd only be allowed to watch Tele if a full TV licence holder was sitting next to you on the sofa?

Or If they followed the bike licence, you'd only be allowed to watch TVs up to 15" until you took your test, then it'd be 2 years watching TV on screens up to 33" unless you're over 21 in which case you could take the "Direct to Couch Potato"  one week intensive course....

Of course we'd then have folk on here demanding that you resit the test every 10 years to prove you know who's shagging who on Eastenders.....
Reply
#9
Advice - you're buying a licence because you live with a TV viewer?

Let you TV watching mate buy (and pay for) the licence; the licence merely covers the address where the TV is located regardless of the individuals living there (therefore *you* don't have to have the licence).
Reply
#10
Wot AdieR said. You only need one licence per house unless each person living there has a separate contract with the landlord and a locking bedroom. If you don't watch TV but your housemate does then let him/her pay for it.

The problem with that, as I found last time I shared a house, is that you'll need to repeatedly remind the TVL bastards that the household has a licence, it's just not in your name. I was twice accused of breakign the law when I bought a DVD recorder as they didn't have a record of a licence in my name even though they had one for my address  >:
Sadness is just another word for not enough coffee
Reply
#11
(10-10-12, 06:55 PM)AdieR link Wrote: Advice - you're buying a licence because you live with a TV viewer?

Let you TV watching mate buy (and pay for) the licence; the licence merely covers the address where the TV is located regardless of the individuals living there (therefore *you* don't have to have the licence).

Don't think the co habitator otherwise known as The Girlfriend (TV Soap Addict) would accept that argument  Smile

I don't think there's any point in going over to TVLR and flaming them en masse, although they are deserving, it just lowers you to their level, the membership of their forum is shrinking daily anyway, not surprised with their attitude.

Apparantly I'm not the only one to get barred for wanting to discuss something other than being LLF.
Reply
#12
(11-10-12, 09:12 AM)Streetbudgie link Wrote: I don't think there's any point in going over to TVLR and flaming them en masse, although they are deserving, it just lowers you to their level, the membership of their forum is shrinking daily anyway, not surprised with their attitude.

Flaming is so passe. I'm talking about a nice subtle trolling. Start small, get a conversation going that they're interested in, then get a few people in to pass some unusual opinions, then ramp it up.

The whole idea is to get them to flame and get themselves banned from their own forum.

Childish I know, but I'm bored Smile
Reply
#13
TV Licences GRRRRR dont get me on my soap boxes about that!!!

Tv licences only used to cover 3 tv sets per household so when as teenagers we had 4 tv's in the house parents had to buy 2 licences!!!

It ain't what you ride, it's who you ride with!!!
Reply
#14
Quote:3 tv sets per household

Your having a laugh? Well your mum and dad were :pokefun
Another ex-Fazer rider that is a foccer again
Reply
#15
No the old TV licences circa 1979 you were only licenced upto three TV sets per household!

but in those days nurses homes ( where nurses lived on site at hospitals rather than nursing homes!!) and military accomodation got free TV licences. thats all changed now....

i can feel red mist coming down  so will move on before i get into full rant mode!


It ain't what you ride, it's who you ride with!!!
Reply
#16
They use to hassle my 93 yr old uncle for not having a TV licence even though he didn't have a TV and could have got a license for free anyway.

They told him that to avoid harassment he should get his free license.
Problem was that having spent the last war inventing new and more efficient ways to kill Germans he wasn't about to play that game.

It was all a big game for him, no sooner had he reached agreement with one 'jobsworth' then a new and
more vicious 'enforcer would appear and ask to search his house for a TV. :'(

He died in 2007 having never had a license.
Reply
#17
A few years ago I threw my telly out.  Phone the licence folks and told em.  They asked me a few questions, seemed a bit baffled that I was keeping my sat receiver for listen to the radio, mentioned that I might get a visit, to which I replied that if the person was polite and courteous I would allow them in my home, but if I didn't like em they wouldn't be getting in.

For over three years I lived happily without a TV, and never heard a peep from the TV licence folks.  I even moved house and had to contact them again to state there was no TV at my new address.  Bought a telly last year (oh why, oh why did I do it?) and once again I have a license.

Yup I know a few other folks who live without TV and get constant hassle, but they never bothered with me.




Reply
#18
what else can you do to make the long winter nights fly by ??
Reply
#19
I see what you're saying VNA, but why should we have to prove that we don't have a TV? When I lived in a flat with electricity only I didn't have to phone the gas board every year. It's not like I've got kids here and the social workers want to make sure I'm not abusing them. It's not like I'm keeping guns or dangerous animals and need to prove they're locked away safely. Not having a TV effects only me, so why should I let inspectors into my home? Why should I get a threatening letter each and every month?

If they were a loan company they'd have had their licence taken away! And back to the OP - it's evident that that forum's rubbish as they appear to have had no effect whatsoever.
[Image: 151860.png]
Reply
#20
When I moved into my place I had a TV but no freeview box, only my Xbox connected up to it.  The renewal for the previous owner came through, I just phoned them up and told them I can't receive anything and they said ok, we'll call you back in a year  :thumbup
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)