BREXIT

[VNA]

Indeed.
Charges have been passed to the Procurator Fiscal.

[steve 10562cc]

Not right to comment further till after the trial.

[agricola]

You seem to be oblivious to political events in Scotland, perhaps you're focusing too hard on events here. Let me enlighten you. The First Minister of Scotland is facing a misconduct investigation for holding a series of meetings with a former First Minister of Scotland, who was recently under investigation himself, but has been successful in his judicial review of the allegations made against him. Why the First Minister felt the need to claim these meetings were unofficial, when  government officials were present, at here home, has yet to be revealed.
This one still has some mileage to go yet. Cant wait  :lol
Oh, and do try and keep up

As I pointed out previously the judicial review brought by Mr Salmond was in respect of the government being in breach of it’s own procedures in their investigation of allegations made against him.  It was not as you said a review of the actual allegations made against him.

This one still has some mileage to go yet. Cant wait  :lol

That was the only bit you got right agricola. :lol

Former Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond arrested - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-46984747

Yes this one could run for a wee while. :eek

Nope, I was absolutely bang on, it was a review of the allegations, not an inquiry of the allegations. You are just too keen to pick fault. Ihm suprized ur not corecting evriwons grama!

[dazza]

Not right to comment further till after the trial.

Ah shit....You had to go and say it, didn't you.  :lol

[VNA]

Nope, I was absolutely bang on, it was a review of the allegations, not an inquiry of the allegations.

Nope sorry you don't have a clue. :lol

[steve 10562cc]

So she really is little jimmy cranky

[agricola]

Nope, I was absolutely bang on, it was a review of the allegations, not an inquiry of the allegations.

Nope sorry I don't have a clue. :lol

Neither do I

[VNA]

Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread   « Reply #1804 on: Today at 07:51:17 PM »

• Quote
  
• Modify
  

  Quote<blockquote>Nope, I was absolutely bang on, it was a review of the allegations, not an inquiry of the allegations.</blockquote>

Nope sorry you don't have a clue. [img alt=:lol]http://foc-u.co.uk/Smileys/efocicon/lol.gif[/img]

Agricola, Mr Salmond quit the SNP and brought a legal action against the government.  It was a judicial review into government procedure.  Mr Salmond alleged that the government did not correctly implement it’s own investigative procedures.  He won his case.
You stated,

a former First Minister of Scotland, who was recently under investigation himself, but has been successful in his judicial review of the allegations made against him.

There has been no judicial review into the allegations made against Mr Salmond.


 

[agricola]

Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread   « Reply #1804 on: Today at 07:51:17 PM »

• Quote
  
• Modify
  

  Quote<blockquote>Nope, I was absolutely bang on, it was a review of the allegations, not an inquiry of the allegations.</blockquote>

Nope sorry you don't have a clue. [img alt=:lol]http://foc-u.co.uk/Smileys/efocicon/lol.gif[/img]

Agricola, Mr Salmond quit the SNP and brought a legal action against the government.  It was a judicial review into government procedure.  Mr Salmond alleged that the government did not correctly implement it’s own investigative procedures.  He won his case.
You stated,

a former First Minister of Scotland, who was recently under investigation himself, but has been successful in his judicial review of the allegations made against him.

There has been no judicial review into the allegations made against Mr Salmond.

Fuck me! :eek

[/size]Mr Salmond initiated a judicial review which found that the Scottish Govt, as you correctly stated, cocked up. My understanding is, and I'm sure you will correct me if i am wrong, that those allegations are now unlikely to be continued as the process was tainted.
[/size]
[/size]Now, you and I could argue the toss about the correct legal terminology until the desert sands turn to ice and the camels come skating home, but that'll just make me look like a boring twat like you, so i'm not going to.
[/size]
[/size]Good evening
[/size]
[/size]
[/size]
[/size][size=78%] [/size]

[ogri48]

[quote author=steve 10562cc link=topic=24678.msg291238#msg291238 date=1548358014]
Not right to comment further till after the trial.

Ah shit....You had to go and say it, didn't you.  :lol

[/quote]
lol now thats foccing funny... :lol :lol

[VNA]

Mr Salmond initiated a judicial review which found that the Scottish Govt, as you correctly stated, cocked up.

He resinged from the SNP.  He then brought a judical review against the government.  His complaint was that they did not correctly follow their own proceedure.  He won.
The judical review did not consider the allegations against Mr Salmond and made no comment on them.  The allegations stand.
Today Mr Salmond was arrested by the Scottish police force on the basis of those allegations.  Mr Salmond has been charged.

[VNA]

[mtread]

So now to add Airbus to the No Deal disaster club, with


Sony
Dyson
Honda
Toyota
and all the others.


Yet the 'stupid woman' is still not listening

[VNA]

Yet the 'stupid woman' is still not listening

[darrsi]

Theresa May  :lol


https://youtu.be/ZiQGA48uY-g

[YamFazFan]

Yet the 'stupid woman' is still not listening

She's not listening to an oportunistic marxist for sure. I don't blame her. The minute he starts dictating policy we've all had it.


Corbyn's just looking for any excuse to shirk and wriggle out of making a true commitment one way or the other outside of No Deal. He knows she won't take it off the agenda and in turn it gives him an excuse to refuse to talk.


Labour are trying to be Leave in the north and Remain in the south.


Everybody knows 'No Deal' isn't going to happen. It's been left on the agenda purely for negotiating reasons and to gee Parliament along towards accepting a deal.

[mtread]

If everybody knows that No Deal isn't going to happen, how can it be a negotiating position? Or are the Tory MPs who need to be won over that stupid?

[VNA]

If everybody knows that No Deal isn't going to happen, how can it be a negotiating position?

Yeah I too would like to know how that makes sense. 

If it ain't gonna happen.  Take it off the table.  And buisiness can stop wasting millions of pounds everyday making NO DEAL preparations, and jobs will be so much safer.

[VNA]

Meanwhile here’s BREXIT hero Tim Martin being interviewed by Owen Jones.  Tim complains about EU laws, but guess what, just like the BREXIT foccers here, he can’t name one law he opposes.


Watch him squirm too when Owen asks about rates of pay at Weatherspoons.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJ2BMEMiO9s

[YamFazFan]

If everybody knows that No Deal isn't going to happen, how can it be a negotiating position? Or are the Tory MPs who need to be won over that stupid?

No Deal is the default position. As things stand, if nothing happens between now and 29th March we're out with No Deal.


We all know that there's less than a chance in a million of that happening, but it's NOT completely impossible. That's why.