Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
is a k and n filter worth buying, any noticeable difference ?
#12
(21-09-22, 08:55 AM)darrsi link Wrote: [quote author=Grahamm link=topic=27509.msg330268#msg330268 date=1663711962]
[quote author=darrsi link=topic=27509.msg330256#msg330256 date=1663695245]
It's simple maths that you will save money with a K&N.

A quick check of prices suggests that a K&N filter costs roughly four times the price of a HiFlo version.

The Haynes Manual for my FZ6 recommends replacing the filter every 25,000 miles.

So that's 100,000 miles before you break even.

Simple maths.
[/quote]


If you leave a paper filter on for 25,000 miles your bike will not be performing at its best capacity.

[/quote]


If not cleaned during that 25k miles it likely it won't be performing at all on the fzs600 (as pointed out by Mtread)


(20-09-22, 11:12 PM)Grahamm link Wrote: [quote author=darrsi link=topic=27509.msg330256#msg330256 date=1663695245]
It's simple maths that you will save money with a K&N.

A quick check of prices suggests that a K&N filter costs roughly four times the price of a HiFlo version.

The Haynes Manual for my FZ6 recommends replacing the filter every 25,000 miles.

So that's 100,000 miles before you break even.

Simple maths.
[/quote]


Then you have to factor in the time for each removal to air-clean or change the standard filter


Women have chocolate men have bikes.....
including ones who like chocolate....Wink
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: is a k and n filter worth buying, any noticeable difference ? - by midden - 21-09-22, 03:05 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)