https://youtu.be/7VwxRVATbOQ
Just watched this clip as a matter of interest and the possibilty of reusing the ethonol to reduce financial waste.
When it came to siphoning off and then adding fuel boosters I got to wondering if the people who are likely to go to all this effort were previously accepting of E5 in their lawnmowers and the extra 5% has caused a panic or whether they previously always always bought super unleaded which I presume co trained no ethonol.
Either way factoring the 10% loss of fuel in with the cost of fuel booster would it not be more economical to siphon or stick with the now super unleaded E5.
[Edited to fix the tiny font problem: GrahamM - Moderator]
Just watched this clip as a matter of interest and the possibilty of reusing the ethonol to reduce financial waste.
When it came to siphoning off and then adding fuel boosters I got to wondering if the people who are likely to go to all this effort were previously accepting of E5 in their lawnmowers and the extra 5% has caused a panic or whether they previously always always bought super unleaded which I presume co trained no ethonol.
Either way factoring the 10% loss of fuel in with the cost of fuel booster would it not be more economical to siphon or stick with the now super unleaded E5.
[Edited to fix the tiny font problem: GrahamM - Moderator]
Women have chocolate men have bikes.....
including ones who like chocolate....
including ones who like chocolate....