13-06-21, 11:24 AM
(13-06-21, 11:15 AM)Grahamm link Wrote: [quote author=YamFazFan link=topic=26604.msg326055#msg326055 date=1623578007]
At the end of the day it comes down to personal responsibility and if certain people still choose not to accept it there's little more the government can do.
Let me draw a parallel example: A lot of people resisted a seat belt law because it should be "personal responsibility" or an infringement on their "freedoms" etc.
In 1982, the year before the seat belt law was introduced, 2,443 people were killed in accidents on Britain’s roads. 30 years later, that figure had dropped to 816. Now that might not all have been due to seatbelts, but they were certainly contributory to it and yet people's "freedoms" are still intact.
Not wearing a seatbelt only affects you, but someone who is (for whatever reason) not vaccinated, can spread the virus to others and may even have a variant that the vaccine may not work on.
Now, yes, their decision not to be vaccinated may *also* be selfish, but demanding that the rules be changed because of what the majority have done (let alone because someone has declared an arbitrary date as "Freedom Day") when there is still a risk of new outbreaks, as is happening at the moment, will just make the situation worse, so decisions that affect the whole population have to consider this fact.
[/quote]I have heard the "seat belt" one on the radio too. :rolleyes And I have heard it repeated loads of times from people repeating it as though it was their own. Its apt that you should use the seatbelt metaphor because the same communities that we are referring to who are refusing the jab are also the same ones who repeatedly flout the seatbelt laws.
I don't do rain or threat there of. dry rider only with no shame.