Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Christchurch
#6
(18-03-19, 09:41 PM)VNA link Wrote: You object to You Tube etc taking down the footage F4celess?  Really?

I was merely making comparison to the way this recent event has been handled by the media (compared to the quantity of graphic video content still in the public domain - ISIS, war footage, 9/11, etc). All the other stuff on sites such as youtube, frequented by youngsters, no restrictions, who could come across such footage by accident. Why hasn't all the other (equally as terrible) videos been stripped from these video sharing sites with the same urgency (infact not at all).

VNA - Really? Bordering slander. At NO POINT did I state (or indicate) I "object to You Tube etc taking down the footage".
You intentionally chose to misread my text in order to create confrontation? Create hysteria? Or a sheep mentality, played/expanded on mtreads comment? Safety in numbers? Or a combination of all of the above? Smile

My points were completely missed.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Christchurch - by VNA - 16-03-19, 12:20 PM
Re: Christchurch - by VNA - 17-03-19, 06:19 PM
Re: Christchurch - by F4celess - 18-03-19, 04:00 PM
Re: Christchurch - by mtread - 18-03-19, 06:43 PM
Re: Christchurch - by VNA - 18-03-19, 09:41 PM
Re: Christchurch - by F4celess - 19-03-19, 04:13 PM
Re: Christchurch - by VNA - 19-03-19, 11:29 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: