07-12-18, 11:33 PM
(07-12-18, 09:03 PM)fazersharp link Wrote: [quote author=tommyardin link=topic=23732.msg288575#msg288575 date=1544209370]On an old building with new brick extension and if you are not bonding/tieing in which forces you to keep up. Which looks uglier - deeper beds to try and keep up or mismatched brick to brick.
Yeah Metric gauge is tighter than Imperial by 1.2mm per course of bricks, that is why building an extension on a imperial gauged house with metric bricks when they were the standard was a bastard as you either, lost gauge again the main house or you ended up with large bed joint to keep up. Seeing as you new brickwork bonded/tied into the original you ended up with large bed joints , of course on a complete new build it was not a problem.
[/quote]
Miss-matched brick to brick looks worse. More obvious to the eye than deeper mortar beds I think.
It must be a cost saving thing to use metric bricks in such a situation. Some of the old types are probably only available via reclamation and there's company's making certain patterns in imperial size, but it's bound to be dearer isn't it.