15-05-17, 11:01 AM
we'll have to disagree on a lot of this, you obviously think my comments are hilarious by your use of emoji's. If the cop thought it was that dangerous he'd have booked him but he had no proof. The OP stated there was no oncoming traffic or that it was a dangerous situation. All the cop done was to get a rider to sit back in a 60 coz he was worried about being pulled again......great road safety!
I never said to drive at 50, re read my post....I said people driving at 50 on a motorway are a danger and agree with the points you make there.....undue care and attention is down to piss poor observation but are you telling me that you think people doing 50% of the limit in any area with no other dangerous factors is ok?
limits are limits, not targets but when there are no underlying adverse factors then the max speed should be adhered to, going back to the OP it still appears to me that the cop was a bit over the top but none of us can make the call without being only the original poster stated knows what was what
I never said to drive at 50, re read my post....I said people driving at 50 on a motorway are a danger and agree with the points you make there.....undue care and attention is down to piss poor observation but are you telling me that you think people doing 50% of the limit in any area with no other dangerous factors is ok?
limits are limits, not targets but when there are no underlying adverse factors then the max speed should be adhered to, going back to the OP it still appears to me that the cop was a bit over the top but none of us can make the call without being only the original poster stated knows what was what
fire never sleeps