10-05-17, 09:17 PM
a couple of points
you on the bike or in a car, if a bike then how were you stuck behind the learner for 5 miles (remember stepping stones?)
if he's non traffic (i.e. the car, as you don't know if he's ever worked traffic and knows the subtleties of traffic law) then stand your ground and get him to explain why it was wrong to do what you did?
if he had no speed gun type apparatus in the car then how could he say you were doing a certain speed let alone careless driving?
if he wasn't ex traffic then he probably doesn't even know about IAM or RoSPA, I got talking to two in a plod car who were clueless and queried why I'd want to even join RoSPA and do road safety
The days of the Courts taking a Coppers word over Joe Public has long gone, a lot of them are liars and Judges see right through them especially after a decent brief has tore them up for arse paper
you on the bike or in a car, if a bike then how were you stuck behind the learner for 5 miles (remember stepping stones?)
if he's non traffic (i.e. the car, as you don't know if he's ever worked traffic and knows the subtleties of traffic law) then stand your ground and get him to explain why it was wrong to do what you did?
if he had no speed gun type apparatus in the car then how could he say you were doing a certain speed let alone careless driving?
if he wasn't ex traffic then he probably doesn't even know about IAM or RoSPA, I got talking to two in a plod car who were clueless and queried why I'd want to even join RoSPA and do road safety
The days of the Courts taking a Coppers word over Joe Public has long gone, a lot of them are liars and Judges see right through them especially after a decent brief has tore them up for arse paper
fire never sleeps