13-08-16, 12:08 PM
Oh dear, here we go again...
Ad Hominem Tu Quoque "[...] if Source A criticizes the actions of Source B, a tu quoque response is that Source A has acted in the same way. This argument is false because it does not disprove the premise; if the premise is true then Source A may be a hypocrite, but this does not make the statement less credible"
In other words, what Streetbudgie may or may not have done does not exonerate the driver from their actions.
Ad Hominem Tu Quoque "[...] if Source A criticizes the actions of Source B, a tu quoque response is that Source A has acted in the same way. This argument is false because it does not disprove the premise; if the premise is true then Source A may be a hypocrite, but this does not make the statement less credible"
In other words, what Streetbudgie may or may not have done does not exonerate the driver from their actions.