Topical question, in the UK news.

[lew600fazer]

Ive been watching some of the arguments for and against in the house of commons and they both have merrits even though the only one that i can understand thats for bombing is the show solidarity with the French. As bad as what happened in paris is i cant think of too many times that the French have shown solidarity with us in fact i remember a story my granddad told about a french officer showing a german officer what was what on a map at Dunkirk.The next day they poured diesel oil on the sea and set fire to it to burn the british and commonwealth troop trying to get to the rescue boats. The other thing thats peeing me off is that for something so important there seemed to be a lot more mp there to vote on their 10% pay rise than to hear all the arguments.The fact is without ground troops its a waste of lives.

Never believe all the stories your grand fathers tell you, the French fought nearly to the last man defending the surrounding areas leading to Dunkirk, so we could get the feck out of it. History lesson, 1956 the French & Brits invaded Egypt over the Suez crisis, it was our friends the USA told us to get the fuck out of the place, thus allowing Nassi to take control of the Suez canal zone and gain the protection of the Russians. The Brits being a Colonial power handed Vietnam back to France after WW2. Again the USA had it's head up it's own arse. They refused to back Chang Ki Shak against Mao and the republic of China, China armed the Viet Cong and kicked the French out. The USA got there butts kicked in Vietnam. Why are we big mates with the USA , they never win anything on there own lol. Back the Russians, way to go Valadimir, top man.