Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rear shock
#5


i am not entirely in agreement with northwestern but only because my own limited experience tells me differently: my bike had 20k on the clock when i bought it and the standard rear shock had no damping left at all, it was effectively spring only and pogo'd along the road. i immediately sent it to k-tech and they re-built it and it was a huge improvement, it cost around £100. Not so many miles later I lucked upon a zero mile late s1000rr shock on ebay for £40 and fitted that (factor in another £30-40 machine shop costs for top spacers and lower bolt to be made) and there was a massive improvement again. the bmw spring is firmer than the standard item but the ride is more comfortable, much more than that however it corners much much better - i am a good 10 - 15 mph quicker through the same bends. i put this down to slightly increased rear height and much better quality of damping.



is it clean enough?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Rear shock - by Tangoman - 15-09-15, 06:25 PM
Re: Rear shock - by esetest - 15-09-15, 07:05 PM
Re: Rear shock - by NorthWestern - 15-09-15, 07:12 PM
Re: Rear shock - by PieEater - 15-09-15, 08:06 PM
Re: Rear shock - by bludclot - 15-09-15, 09:06 PM
Re: Rear shock - by mark g - 15-09-15, 09:11 PM
Re: Rear shock - by JKay - 15-09-15, 10:00 PM
Re: Rear shock - by Falcon 269 - 16-09-15, 05:28 AM
Re: Rear shock - by Tangoman - 18-09-15, 07:33 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)