10-01-15, 06:28 PM
Lew - yes, and I managed to understand that the judge would explain all the points of law to the jury. The judge would give direction to the jury to decide what facts to consider against which points of law. The job of the jury is to decide on the evidence, which is true and which isn't. However I agree with you that Evans' case should have been decided by just a judge. That's what would have happened if he'd pleaded guilty in the first place.
As to my 'nugget' it's in the appeal transcript:
As to my 'nugget' it's in the appeal transcript:
Quote:The prosecution case was that the applicant had booked the room at the Premier Inn with the main or sole purpose of procuring a girl or girls later that night.and of course as we now know, the prosecution was correct