10-04-14, 11:41 AM
(10-04-14, 09:58 AM)noggythenog link Wrote: But could they give Nick the benefit of the doubt that his speedo may have been reading up to 10% less than what his actual speed was though?It doesn't work like that. To meet type approval a speedo may over read by up to 10% but cannot under read by any amount. So what your speedo shows will always be up to 10% faster than you are really travelling at, never less. So to be doing an actual 91 mph, I suspect the speedo would have been reading nearer the ton.