165?

[stevierst]

[quote author=fireblake link=topic=9175.msg91769#msg91769 date=1375364845]
Quite right too. If he's banned then needs punishing. But looking at the vid I can't see anything wrong.  Nice empty motorway means flat out IMHO. I heard on the news some hand wringing liberal say the potential to cause harm and possible death or something similar.  Utter tosh. Life has the potential to cause harm or possible death. If unlimited speeding is good  enough for our European friends the Germans then its good enough for me. 
Where it's safe to do so

Mickey >

Ya know, what with modern sensors, I reckon ALL motorways should have variable limits. Slower than 70 when congested (as speeding IS dangerous then), but then much faster when the roads are empty. As you say, empty road, no danger to others. But then make Dangerous Driving charges more severe.

How about Autobahn style derestriction between 11pm and 4am?
[/quote]
Couldn't agree more bud! We need a bit of freedom over here, and vary the speeds at off peak times. We then need stronger penalties for breaking those rules.
It'd be great if it happens, but bloody unlikely!