Poll: how long do we have to put up with the media frenzy ?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
a week
4.17%
1 4.17%
a month
4.17%
1 4.17%
a year
8.33%
2 8.33%
too bluming long
79.17%
19 79.17%
Not long enough
4.17%
1 4.17%
Total 24 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A new royal baby. Whoopie.
#12
(23-07-13, 07:24 AM)slimwilly link Wrote: Any one who thinks they cost the country are wrong, yes some comes out of the public purse but what they bring in tourism to this country cannot be counted.
The Prince ,the Duchy of Cornwall owns thousands of acres of farm land, a 1/4 of herefordshire , employing hundreds of people,


It is an institution that we should be proud of,and protect it,,lots of other countrys have monarchs,


+1


I have, through my job, met and spoke with members of both families and can only say nice things about them. Nice people who spend time chatting to all walks of life.
I mentioned on here a wee while back that I was coming to London for the first time earlier this year. After hearing I was there, 2 of them came to meet me in a bar for a few drinks then returned to a family doo.
As said above, Charles bought Dumfries house up this way which was falling apart. It now employs a fair few people in one of the worst employment areas in Scotland.
Better to stand and look a fool than speak and prove it !
If it aint broke, I'll fix it till it is !!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by simonm - 22-07-13, 11:07 PM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by chaz - 23-07-13, 12:15 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by ChristoT - 23-07-13, 12:24 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by dBfazer600 - 23-07-13, 12:37 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by cbx63 - 23-07-13, 12:41 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by dBfazer600 - 23-07-13, 12:44 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by slimwilly - 23-07-13, 07:24 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by ponkster - 23-07-13, 07:30 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by simonm - 23-07-13, 07:49 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by slimwilly - 23-07-13, 08:10 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by Looney tune - 23-07-13, 08:26 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by clayt74 - 23-07-13, 08:29 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by simonm - 23-07-13, 08:55 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by Slaninar - 23-07-13, 09:18 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by Tefer - 23-07-13, 09:26 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by VNA - 23-07-13, 11:35 AM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by Oldgit - 23-07-13, 12:01 PM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by Ben Diesel - 23-07-13, 12:03 PM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by paul1606 - 23-07-13, 12:23 PM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by peterjca - 23-07-13, 12:56 PM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by Grahamm - 23-07-13, 04:12 PM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by VNA - 23-07-13, 05:53 PM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by jon - 23-07-13, 07:20 PM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by nick crisp - 23-07-13, 07:26 PM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by taylor - 23-07-13, 08:19 PM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by VNA - 23-07-13, 09:09 PM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by dx408 - 23-07-13, 09:38 PM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by Grahamm - 23-07-13, 11:32 PM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by nick crisp - 23-07-13, 11:42 PM
Re: A new royal baby. Whoopie. - by ChristoT - 24-07-13, 06:19 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)