20-06-13, 04:03 AM
(19-06-13, 05:33 PM)ponkster link Wrote: [quote author=littlejohno link=topic=8371.msg82520#msg82520 date=1371652430]
I do and always would, re the personal choice thought if you die it effects more people than you in so many ways so I think its right to be law
I do not directly endanger anyone else on the road if I do not wear a helmet - if indirectly affecting people was used as justification we wouldn't be allowed to drink , smoke , eat red meat , and do any dangerous pass times
And as for the firemen and paramedics - boo hoo - thats what they are paid for
! Lol
[/quote]
First the cost to the economy is huge around a million firna fatal and would you like to deliver the death message !!!
I see the point re drinking and smoking but drinking is limited in certain ways smoking has warnings and age restrictions and both have a huge cost for the country even with the tax.
Its a hard one but i stand by my reasoning though
