|
Caught by a camera
|
02-02-13, 09:33 PM
(02-02-13, 08:58 PM)stevierst link Wrote: The usual criteria In Lancs for prosecution used to be 10% +2 over the limit. Not sure if its changed with the new system. This is what I always thought, but my dad got caught a couple of years ago (albeit in Cornwall / Devon) and went on the course where they said it is 10% + 1 Realistically its not a huge difference, especially at higher speeds, but just something to be aware of 
![[Image: 242673.png]](http://badges.fuelly.com/images/smallsig-uk/242673.png) ![[Image: 174802.png]](http://badges.fuelly.com/images/smallsig-uk/174802.png)
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Caught by a camera - by Panthor - 31-01-13, 09:18 PM
Re: Caught by a camera - by richfzs - 31-01-13, 09:22 PM
Re: Caught by a camera - by chunk166 - 31-01-13, 09:23 PM
Re: Caught by a camera - by Exupnut - 31-01-13, 09:26 PM
Caught by a camera - by Panthor - 31-01-13, 09:30 PM
Re: Caught by a camera - by chunk166 - 31-01-13, 09:39 PM
Re: Caught by a camera - by SEPTIKANGEL - 31-01-13, 09:50 PM
Caught by a camera - by Panthor - 31-01-13, 10:05 PM
Re: Caught by a camera - by pitternator - 01-02-13, 09:16 AM
Re: Caught by a camera - by BBROWN1664 - 01-02-13, 09:49 AM
Caught by a camera - by Panthor - 01-02-13, 09:59 AM
Re: Caught by a camera - by stevierst - 01-02-13, 10:07 AM
Re: Caught by a camera - by UG - 02-02-13, 05:41 PM
Caught by a camera - by cable tie - 02-02-13, 07:39 PM
Re: Caught by a camera - by stevierst - 02-02-13, 08:58 PM
Re: Caught by a camera - by richfzs - 02-02-13, 09:12 PM
Re: Caught by a camera - by stevierst - 02-02-13, 09:29 PM
Re: Caught by a camera - by Dead Eye - 02-02-13, 09:33 PM
Re: Caught by a camera - by stevierst - 02-02-13, 09:36 PM
Caught by a camera - by cable tie - 03-02-13, 12:35 AM
Re: Caught by a camera - by stevierst - 03-02-13, 01:11 AM
|
