have a pair of hand made leather alt-bergs ankle boots ride all the time in them i feel a lot more comfy on and especially off the bike but then the acid test is if i take a tumble or a stone etc hits my shin lol as also ride in dragging jeans
"Dont confuse my personality with my attitude My personality is who I am. My attitude depends on who you are..."
You know what frosties i had the very same thought about an hour ago as i need some new boots.
Part of me says that the need for massive boots is mainly hype....although i personally feel that obviously boots will protect more of the body.....biking is a compromise between comfort & protection.
I think boots also have allot to do with my discomfort with lots of bikes and pegs as i dont have enough flex to comfortably change gear & it becomes a forced effort instead of a natural movement.
All that being said...i think i'll only consider leather bootlets...those ones look a bit too much fabric for my liking.
Easiest way to go fast........don't buy a blue bike
05-04-14, 12:49 PM (This post was last modified: 05-04-14, 12:51 PM by darrsi.)
I used to, but only ever wear boots all the time now anyway, so why not buy a pair of boots that can be worn for general use off the bike as well?
My favourite boots so far have been 5.11 A.T.A.C.
The most comfortable boots i've ever worn, no breaking in, always look smart and great on the bike, plus they are ultra light in weight.
I just bought a new pair but haven't even opened the box yet as my old ones i've had for years still have life left in them!
They do a waterproof "A.T.A.C. Storm" version as well.
05-04-14, 12:53 PM (This post was last modified: 05-04-14, 12:55 PM by Frosties.)
You've both got the same similar thoughts/reservations as me. I've always worn proper bike boots (TCX Infinity) and worry about the reduced protection in an off!! Hadn't thought about stones flying about as Keith mentioned.
Agree that the link i put up is not the best choice and would also go for full leather if i decide to go for it. Maybe these or better....
Like those Matt, but as you say for just local blasting. I don't need new boots, my TCX's were new at Christmas..........I just fancy a slightly more casual boot.
Those are my principles...if you don't like them I have others.
Ok just a pic as a n example but who knows what the sticky out bits on the back of boots are for?????
Full length plus some of these stunt boots have them.
Here's my theory :rolleyes .....they protrude out the back creating a high spot so that if you're sliding on your back then the high spot wears down instead of your calf muscle?????
But could they also not catch on the road & try to rip your foot off????
Easiest way to go fast........don't buy a blue bike
(05-04-14, 01:02 PM)noggythenog link Wrote: Ok just a pic as a n example but who knows what the sticky out bits on the back of boots are for?????
Full length plus some of these stunt boots have them.
Here's my theory :rolleyes .....they protrude out the back creating a high spot so that if you're sliding on your back then the high spot wears down instead of your calf muscle?????
But could they also not catch on the road & try to rip your foot off????
If you're going down the road on your back, your legs tend to ragdoll, and lightly bounce after you.
I'm guessing it's more for looks, and maybe a minute aerodynamic advantage on super sports. It could also be impact resistant (as if you're ever going to hit the deck calf first...).
(05-04-14, 01:39 PM)mickvp link Wrote: I think its just a looks/aerodynamics thing mostly. My RST Tractech full length boots had exactly the same thing.
Ue they're the same boots i've got.....i wasnt wearing them when i crashed but i have had a couple close calls in them & it always tends to be the toe area that gets damaged.
As seen i need new ones, the sole is coming off from where it hit the tarmac but im glad i wasnt wearing trainers.
I've got no damage on any of the upper parts of my boots...hence i reckon i could get by without them.
Easiest way to go fast........don't buy a blue bike
i have oxtar jupiter boots ,I tend to wear them with jeans if I take the bike to work
they are also good as a general casual boot at bike meets , very comfortable
I wear proper race boots most of the time though
Ok then, so apart from Keith and stumpy leg Mick :lol everyone seems to be in the same boat as me...........happy to wear them local (or the idea of) buuuuuuuuut still revert to (or feel safer with) full on boots for normal riding.
Darrsi - what made you switch from shorties to full on boots?? Accident or the security feeling?
Those are my principles...if you don't like them I have others.
Aha mr frosties........but statistically you are more likely to have an off close to home whilst stoogying about....id agree with that.......all the times I've been on a decent, long rideout i haven't felt in the slightest danger....after 50 miles i feel nice & relaxed & more capable..,the tyres are warm & the brakes are working a treat......i am concentrating harder too whilst pushing on.
The local bimble argument is worthy in the sense of it is easy to just chuck stuff on like jeans but not on the protection stakes....unless you only do 20mph
Easiest way to go fast........don't buy a blue bike
05-04-14, 10:48 PM (This post was last modified: 05-04-14, 10:49 PM by midden.)
(05-04-14, 01:37 PM)ChristoT link Wrote: [quote author=noggythenog link=topic=12457.msg139382#msg139382 date=1396699329]
Ok just a pic as a n example but who knows what the sticky out bits on the back of boots are for?????
Full length plus some of these stunt boots have them.
Here's my theory :rolleyes .....they protrude out the back creating a high spot so that if you're sliding on your back then the high spot wears down instead of your calf muscle?????
But could they also not catch on the road & try to rip your foot off????
If you're going down the road on your back, your legs tend to ragdoll, and lightly bounce after you.
I'm guessing it's more for looks, and maybe a minute aerodynamic advantage on super sports. It could also be impact resistant (as if you're ever going to hit the deck calf first...).
[/quote]
Can't imagine anything of mine bouncing lightly
I'd see ankle boots as for short easy going journeys like to the shops
Women have chocolate men have bikes.....
including ones who like chocolate....
(05-04-14, 07:52 PM)Frosties link Wrote: Ok then, so apart from Keith and stumpy leg Mick :lol everyone seems to be in the same boat as me...........happy to wear them local (or the idea of) buuuuuuuuut still revert to (or feel safer with) full on boots for normal riding.
Darrsi - what made you switch from shorties to full on boots?? Accident or the security feeling?
Combination of being on the bike and doing a lot of lifting at work so i'm s'posed to wear safety boots anyway.
I only tend to buy what are primarily special forces boots which are usually hard wearing but mega lightweight and are ridiculously comfortable straight out of the box.
You pay a bit more than normal but they're worth every penny.
I've got about 6 pairs of boots at the moment which all seem to have their own special purpose, ie: one pair is good in icy conditions, another is exceptional in hot weather, another is particularly waterproof, etc.
But the main thing is that they're all lightweight and extremely comfortable which is paramount to me as i'm legging it about all day lifting film equipment, and i'd rather just ride in and then get on with my work rather than messing about with changing footwear.
I do have full height bike boots as well which i'll use when i know it's gonna be pissing down, so they did get used a lot in the recent monsoon weather.
More people are born because of alcohol than will ever die from it.
I came off and my leg got pinned between the swingarm and a wall. I was at a weird angle so I couldn't lift the bike off my leg and had to wait for someone to come along and lift it off me. The weight of the bike was on my leg above my ankle so I was glad I was wearing full length boots! Personally I wouldn't wear the short ones. All they're protecting is your feet