Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Nikko G-pack
#1
just enquiring if anyone has one of these installed, Would like to remove that pesky limit on the first gear.[size=78%] [/size][/size]and also see if it removes the "run like crap mode" when removing the speedo drive as i have done. (although it is barley noticeable)Problem is.. i have removed the speedo drive and most of the pictures i have seen on the net show the deice going in between the drive and the loom, but others go between the ecu and the loom, which one is used for the fazer?Thanks,[size=78%]
[/size]Tom[size=78%]
"Its a Fazer Jim, but not as we know it"
Reply
#2
1st gear limit?
Reply
#3
(23-07-13, 02:04 AM)andybesy link Wrote: 1st gear limit?


Rev limiter
"Its a Fazer Jim, but not as we know it"
Reply
#4
Why do you want to remove the 13.5k limiter?
Reply
#5
I'm not clear on how the Nikko G-pack works, but was under the impression that it alters the fueling map... which would require a fuel injection system in place of the carbs. But if it only alters ignition timing it won't know what the engine revs are if it's meant to be connected between the (missing) speedo sensor and the ignition circuit.
Reply
#6
Not sure whats what with the pack, id like to have it just to at least see if it gets rid of the midrange problems.


And it may be that i have no speedo hooked up that i have such a low limit in first? I'm not sure what it is at, but its definitely there, and annoying.


EDIT: NOT FIRST, SECOND GEAR
"Its a Fazer Jim, but not as we know it"
Reply
#7
Fuelling map on the carbs?
Reply
#8
(23-07-13, 12:35 PM)JZS 600 link Wrote: Fuelling map on the carbs?


Alters the Retard/Advance.
"Its a Fazer Jim, but not as we know it"
Reply
#9
mmm, really?
Reply
#10
(23-07-13, 12:37 PM)JZS 600 link Wrote: mmm, really?


Apparently. Similar thing with the old Gsxr's, forces the ecu to think the bike is at a certain speed. Rather than think its doing the speed it is doing, Or 0mph all the time.(in my case)


Raises the rev limit to 12k on second and third too. although its probably not wise to go that high)
"Its a Fazer Jim, but not as we know it"
Reply
#11
(23-07-13, 12:42 PM)Superfour Tom link Wrote: Raises the rev limit to 12k on second and third too. although its probably not wise to go that high)
What rev limiter?  I'm sure I've had mine past 12k in 1st-3rd... :look
Reply
#12
(23-07-13, 12:46 PM)Lawrence link Wrote: [quote author=Superfour Tom link=topic=9013.msg89729#msg89729 date=1374579753]
Raises the rev limit to 12k on second and third too. although its probably not wise to go that high)
What rev limiter?  I'm sure I've had mine past 12k in 1st-3rd... :look
[/quote]


Who knows, I'll check later.. then repost.


Hope to god i don't have a restricted ecu or something..  Sad
"Its a Fazer Jim, but not as we know it"
Reply
#13
I'm going to check tonight!
Reply
#14
(23-07-13, 12:53 PM)JZS 600 link Wrote: I'm going to check tonight!


Please do, Hope my ecu isn't cooked or something. If you hit a limiter, tell me the revs
"Its a Fazer Jim, but not as we know it"
Reply
#15
Mine definitely revs up to past 12k in 1st-3rd - don't think I've quite gotten there in 4th or higher as I ran out of "runway" / "drag strip" Wink
[Image: 242673.png] [Image: 174802.png]
Reply
#16
(23-07-13, 01:13 PM)Dead Eye link Wrote: Mine definitely revs up to past 12k in 1st-3rd - don't think I've quite gotten there in 4th or higher as I ran out of "runway" / "drag strip" Wink


I'll check mine now, give me 10 mins
"Its a Fazer Jim, but not as we know it"
Reply
#17
Its a carburated  engine, there is no ecu.
Red Heads - Slowly taking over the world!!!
Reply
#18
(23-07-13, 01:25 PM)Skippernick link Wrote: Its a carburated  engine, there is no ecu.
How does the rev limiter work?  Is it off the clocks?
Reply
#19
(23-07-13, 01:25 PM)Skippernick link Wrote: Its a carburated  engine, there is no ecu.


yadda yadda, ecu, cdi.. Whatever.


Just took the bike out and cant get past 10.8 which i suppose is high enough but certainly still annoying when canning it in low gears, As far as i know it was like this before i swapped the engine and switched to r1 front end
"Its a Fazer Jim, but not as we know it"
Reply
#20
I see... kinda.
I must admit I've never noticed a lower rev limit in first or second (or neutral, come to that), but the speedo sender does feed the ignitor unit as well as the speedometer itself and I can't think of any other reason for it to do so… there's no ram air system that might justify modifying the advance for example.
If this is the device then it looks as if it requires the speedo sender to be in place anyway (presumably doubles the frequency of the pulses or something) this will make any speedometer read wrong which would be why they say it's not for road use.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: