After deciding I need stainless downpipes + K&N + after market silencer + Iridium SP's + 97 RON fuel it really needs to go on the rolling road for a tune up!
Just wondering how many of you dudes have had your 600 dyno tuned?? Did it make any huge improvements? Is there anything specific we need to be on the look out for? Has any one got any dyno print outs they could upload onto here?
Any feed back would be most appreciated!!
Cheers
Charlie
I am the Nightrider. I'm a fuel injected suicide machine. I am the rocker, I am the roller, I am the out-of-controller!
Interesting graphs darrsi. Are both lines with the the aftermarket pipes, end can and K & N fitted? The difference being due entirely to cleaning and adjustment of the carbs?
(17-02-13, 06:32 PM)limax2 link Wrote:Interesting graphs darrsi. Are both lines with the the aftermarket pipes, end can and K & N fitted? The difference being due entirely to cleaning and adjustment of the carbs?
Actually now you've said that, this graph was when i had a normal air filter in it, which would've been an ill fitting Hi-Flo type..
I've had it dyno'd since this one with the K&N in, but he never gave me a print out, and i forgot to ask for one. :rolleyes
He did say to me that the K&N doesn't make too much difference BHP wise on Fazers that he's ever seen, whereas he said they do make a big difference to a Bandit for example, even though the bike blatantly feels better when riding with one fitted.
More people are born because of alcohol than will ever die from it.
This was running rich with a touch of clutch slip hence the dip about 9 seconds in the slip has now gone away so I want to take it back up to get a better reading over the rev range
27-02-13, 01:37 PM (This post was last modified: 27-02-13, 01:59 PM by darrsi.)
(27-02-13, 01:19 PM)Revilo18 link Wrote:Hi - where's a good (i.e. not a rip off) place to get a Dyno tune done? Preferably in the South - even better within the M25....
thanks in advance.
(22-03-13, 10:01 PM)red98 link Wrote:anyone know what the bikes had when they were new ?
On MCN's review, it is quoted as 95bhp....but I guess that is not at the back wheel on a Dyno.
I noticed that MCN has changed the average fuel consumption to 55mpg. I think they had it at around 40mpg a while back. Pity the muppets didn't take the time (2 minutes) to check to see how this change would impact its review. If they did, then they would have noticed how this statement would now seem silly and contradictory......
"Apart from its thirst for fuel it would make a great despatcher's motorcycle."
I swear it is a pet peeve when journalists can't be bothered to run their articles through spell checkers. It's their damn job to write content after all and it should be done professionally - note this is in relation to the fact that they spelt "dispatchers" wrong *sighs*
It just rubs me completely the wrong way and some are a lot worse than others. English is becoming a very rare language...