Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Part VIII
#1
Now is this the Numerall that "wrong" on clocks?  Isn't there one that that's not right, 'cos some king wanted it to look different..Where's my peanuts?
I can put three hundred letters in here? Really?  I can dump this much crap at the bottom of each and every post and reply that I do, and there not a stinking thing  you can do about it.  I can also put in a picture you say?  My my, aren’t we generous with the space all of a sudden.  This won’t last
Reply
#2
No it's 4 which is IIII on locks. The story I heard is that a King designed a clockface which had IIII on it. When told it should be IV he said I'm the King therefore IV is wrong and IIII is correct.

Doubt it's a true story though :\
[Image: 151860.png]
Reply
#3
I think it's the same King who wore invisible clothes
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: