Date: 16-06-24  Time: 00:11 am

Author Topic: fazer fzs 600 1999  (Read 9196 times)

MadDogMcQ

  • Club Racer
  • ****
  • Posts: 478
  • Horwich, Bolton, NW UK.
    • Main bike:
      FZ1 Faired Gen2
    • - CB250N
    • View Profile
    • My Website
Re: fazer fzs 600 1999
« Reply #25 on: 05 July 2012, 11:49:23 am »
ANY bike in top gear should actually be showing less revs than the speed. So at 50, revs should be about 4k, at 60, revs should be about 5k, at 80, revs should be about 7k.
 
That's because your sixth gear is like an overdrive - the ratio is probably about 0.8:1 whereas fifth gear is likely 1:1. 
 
You've not got a missing sixth gear have you?  :lol :rollin :lol
 
Tom
QUENTIN TARANTINO - HALLOWED BE THY NAME!

gordon

  • DAS Born Again
  • **
  • Posts: 90
  • you only live once ride like the devil
    • Main bike:
      FZS600 98-99
    • View Profile
Re: fazer fzs 600 1999
« Reply #26 on: 05 July 2012, 10:21:00 pm »
no mate got all 6 gears ,but i can live with it cos it goes like shit of a spade .

Pickle

  • DAS Born Again
  • **
  • Posts: 94
    • Main bike:
      FZS600 02-03
    • View Profile
Re: fazer fzs 600 1999
« Reply #27 on: 05 July 2012, 11:01:16 pm »
Am I being stupid?  :rolleyes


Probably, but why would the riders size or weight have anything to do with how many revs a bike pulls at a given speed? Surely it's a direct ratio of gearbox rpm to wheel rpm. Wheel or tyre size wouldn't make any indicated difference as the speedo measures wheel rotation.


Must be a sprocket change to do this.


If you are talking about top end speed then I'll get my coat[size=78%].[/size] :lol


Bob

Rangrally

  • CBT Wobbler
  • *
  • Posts: 31
    • Main bike:
      FZS600 98-99
    • - KLE500
    • View Profile
Re: fazer fzs 600 1999
« Reply #28 on: 06 July 2012, 02:00:58 pm »
Am I being stupid?  :rolleyes


Probably, but why would the riders size or weight have anything to do with how many revs a bike pulls at a given speed? Surely it's a direct ratio of gearbox rpm to wheel rpm. Wheel or tyre size wouldn't make any indicated difference as the speedo measures wheel rotation.


Must be a sprocket change to do this.


If you are talking about top end speed then I'll get my coat[size=78%].[/size] :lol


Bob


I agree, nothing to do with power to weight unless of course you are so fat/un-aerodynamic that you make the clutch slip - THEN the RPM would be different ;)

Dead Eye

  • GP Hero
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,753
  • What doesn't kill me, will only make me stronger.
    • Main bike:
      FZS 1000 Gen1
    • - FZS600 00-01
    • View Profile
Re: fazer fzs 600 1999
« Reply #29 on: 06 July 2012, 07:12:16 pm »
The difference in weight / size would increase drag and decrease acceleration if anything, but shouldn't affect the RPM vs Speed - pretty sure you aren't going mad as this is what I think as well...

misterjayb1

  • Weekend Warrior
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
    • Main bike:
      FZS600 02-03
    • View Profile
Re: fazer fzs 600 1999
« Reply #30 on: 08 July 2012, 09:58:46 pm »
Before picking up my 02 foxeye fzs 600 I read the MCN review.. I am sure its been mentioned on here, but states clearly in black and white 130 miles to a tank  :eek ... I know they can drink a bit when ridden hard but just back from 160 miler n still showin a third full on guage and could only fit in £15.00 @ £1.26 per litre..
Better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it...

Dead Eye

  • GP Hero
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,753
  • What doesn't kill me, will only make me stronger.
    • Main bike:
      FZS 1000 Gen1
    • - FZS600 00-01
    • View Profile
Re: fazer fzs 600 1999
« Reply #31 on: 08 July 2012, 11:11:25 pm »
Yeah, I picked this up - they can't do maths either ;)

It shows the tank size and the average MPG which add up pretty close, but the range is completely wrong :P