Author Topic: Thundercat carb-engined Fazers 1998-2003. (Read 9917 times)

oldmotherfoccer · « **on:** 29 December 2010, 05:06:29 pm »

Thundercat carb-engined Fazers 1998-2003.

no no no, its NOT i repeat NOT a thuncercat engine, thats why so many people get muddled,

why not just use "carb-engined Fazers 1998-2003"

Farjo · « **Reply #1 on:** 29 December 2010, 05:35:47 pm »

frazer · « **Reply #2 on:** 29 December 2010, 06:37:35 pm »

Or just change it to "The proper Fazer" 1998-2003

Username · « **Reply #3 on:** 30 December 2010, 05:19:53 pm »

Isn't it just easier to call them the air cooled fazers?

flesh · « **Reply #4 on:** 31 December 2010, 01:02:08 pm »

Quote from: frazer on 29 December 2010, 06:37:35 pm

Or just change it to "The proper Fazer" 1998-2003

dx408 · « **Reply #5 on:** 10 February 2011, 11:22:06 pm »

How about the Fazer with crap lights

Until you HID it that is

Username · « **Reply #6 on:** 04 March 2011, 06:58:30 pm »

What's a 'Thundercarb'

Motorbreath · « **Reply #7 on:** 30 June 2011, 01:41:04 am »

What is happening?

jusu · « **Reply #8 on:** 30 June 2011, 10:24:19 pm »

Not much, watching the game, having a Fazer.

Supanova7G · « **Reply #9 on:** 19 September 2011, 08:12:29 pm »

You have me all curious now because I was also misguided and thought we had thundercat engines. What do we actually have?

oldmotherfoccer · « **Reply #10 on:** 21 September 2011, 09:14:11 am »

you have a Fazer engine that shares some gearbox components with a thundercat, It was never a "detuned" sports bike engine, which is the common misconception, it was an engine designed for the fazer

mr grimsdale · « **Reply #11 on:** 23 September 2011, 04:54:40 pm »

So after all these years of having a

with "

carbs" then to be told that they are in actual fact "Thundercat carbs" Then to be told that they REALLY are

carbs that were made specifically for the

to fit on a

and not on a Thundercat..Good, think I have got it now, but to be honest I think Thundercat carbs sounds better than

carbs so I think we should just call them "kiddon Thundercat carbs" that want to be

carbs.........With the air cooled engine.

hope that clears that up....going for a drink now, think i need one.

Dunky · « **Reply #12 on:** 24 September 2011, 11:12:52 am »

So I take it from all that you have a Fazer then Davie

.

mr grimsdale · « **Reply #13 on:** 26 September 2011, 08:23:55 pm »

Nope...........I have a

oldmotherfoccer · « **Reply #14 on:** 27 September 2011, 12:33:38 am »

yes you have a fazer

Bracechenko · « **Reply #15 on:** 27 September 2011, 09:02:39 pm »

Just to keep this thread alive.....I know it has cooling fins but isn't it water cooled rather than air cooled??

solorider · « **Reply #16 on:** 28 September 2011, 07:24:40 pm »

Quote from: Bracechenko on 27 September 2011, 09:02:39 pm

Just to keep this thread alive.....I know it has cooling fins but isn't it water cooled rather than air cooled??

technicaly the bike is both air and water cooled,you need air flow to cool the water in the radiator,no air flow and the engine will over heat

Major Rant · « **Reply #17 on:** 28 September 2011, 09:18:24 pm »

Quote

technicaly the bike is both air and water cooled,you need air flow to cool the water in the radiator,no air flow and the engine will over heat

Just want to stamp on this before it becomes an 'established truth'.
The FZS600 engine is water cooled, the fins are a 'styling addition' and have no function (I think they harp back to the old 1980s FAZER 750).
The 'air-flow is needed' argument is also false: If you take a stationary FZS600 and run the engine for 30 minutes guess what happens .... The radiator fan starts!!

"And this, my lord is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped ..." - M Python.

Kev8261 · « **Reply #18 on:** 28 September 2011, 09:45:48 pm »

The END

kebab19 · « **Reply #19 on:** 29 September 2011, 09:07:53 am »

Probably doesn't help to have the bike lumped in as a derivative of the Thundercat as per the Haynes manual?

limax2 · « **Reply #20 on:** 29 September 2011, 09:47:29 pm »

Quote from: Major Rant on 28 September 2011, 09:18:24 pm

The 'air-flow is needed' argument is also false: If you take a stationary FZS600 and run the engine for 30 minutes guess what happens .... The radiator fan starts!!

And the fan draws in air to cool the water!

solorider · « **Reply #21 on:** 29 September 2011, 10:04:46 pm »

Quote from: limax2 on 29 September 2011, 09:47:29 pm

Quote from: Major Rant on 28 September 2011, 09:18:24 pm

The 'air-flow is needed' argument is also false: If you take a stationary FZS600 and run the engine for 30 minutes guess what happens .... The radiator fan starts!!

And the fan draws in air to cool the water!

and that is the answer to my question,you need air flow to cool the engine,no air no cooling no matter where the air comes from