It's a shame that the middle ground solution cannot be the answer: Don't ban all muslims, but ban any that appear on the intelligence radar of any country that be trusted (fellow NATO and trusted EU nations) - any doubt, sorry you stay out. I bloody resent the fact that we allow hate preachers, known dissidents, HAMAS sponsors and known insurgents in, or worse they get in illegally and then when we find they (and their stated funded lawyers and nazi-sympathisers like CAGE) cry Human Rights and appeal deportation (and this applies to 'asylum seekers' too). I also don't get how some one like Tyson Fury is chastised for using Homophobic language, yet Captain Hook used it repeatedly during outside preaching in North London and nothing was done (in fact the media has backed off Fury, couldn't be because they found out he is from another 'persecuted' minority, could it?). Look at Michael Adjebalajo now trying to sue the MoJ for assault by prison officers; where do thes nazis get off - he should have been kicked out the day MI5 found out he had islamonazi tendencies. Or that father who blame the MET for his kid fucking off to Syria, until a video showed him at a Nazi rally in Bedforshire.
The apologists are so worried about the rights of our fascist enemies that they cravenly bow to their rights before that of the greater, honest, decent majority (most of whom are now arreligious and find the whole thing archaic and tedious).
Trump just used the message the average middle Septic would understand and didn't drape it in PC language. If we ban Trump from the UK, can we ban any scumbag with fascist sympathies too? I'd take that like a shot.
