For all the grammar Nazi's out there

[imax]

 

[risticuss]

 


defo 4wardin dis to all ma peeps...

[Frosties]

So this will be for all the Nazis not Nazi's then would it 


Love it, stealing it - cheers.

[Dave48]

I two yoosed to bee pedantique abought grammer & spelling !
Seriously though, language is constantly evolving and changing-just look at the way people spoke/wrote 100/200/300 years ago.
Was taught English grammar in the 50s & 60s-find it difficult to have a conversation with some modern kids with their excessive use of "like" & "innit" 

[Frosties]

I two yoosed to bee pedantique abought grammer & spelling !
Seriously though, language is constantly evolving and changing, just look at the way people spoke & wrote 100, 200 or even 300 years ago.
I was taught English grammar in the 50s & 60s; find it difficult to have a conversation with some modern kids with their excessive use of "like" & "innit". 

Fixed that for you Dave 

[risticuss]

I two yoosed to bee pedantique abought grammer & spelling !
Seriously though, language is constantly evolving and changing, just look at the way people spoke & wrote 100, 200 or even 300 years ago.
I was taught English grammar in the 50s & 60s; find it difficult to have a conversation with some modern kids with their excessive use of "like" & "innit". 

I fixed that for you Dave. 

This could get to be a long topic.

[Frosties]

I two yoosed to bee pedantique abought grammer & spelling !
Seriously though, language is constantly evolving and changing, just look at the way people spoke & wrote 100, 200 or even 300 years ago.
I was taught English grammar in the 50s & 60s; find it difficult to have a conversation with some modern kids with their excessive use of "like" & "innit". 

I fixed that for you Dave. 

This could become a long topic.

You think so? 

[Doddsie]

 

[Neon Knight]

Top Answer 

[Hedgetrimmer]

I two yoosed to bee pedantique abought grammer & spelling !
Seriously though, language is constantly evolving and changing, just look at the way people spoke & wrote 100, 200 or even 300 years ago.
I was taught English grammar in the 50s & 60s; I find it difficult to have a conversation with some modern kids with their excessive use of "like" & "innit". 

I fixed that for you Dave. 

This could become a long topic.

You think so? 

Oh, definitely so. 

[Frosties]

I two yoosed to bee pedantique abought grammer & spelling !
Seriously though, language is constantly evolving and changing, just look at the way people spoke & wrote 100, 200 or even 300 years ago.
I was taught English grammar in the 50s & 60s; i find it difficult to have a conversation with some modern kids and their excessive use of "like" & "innit". 

I fixed that for you Dave. 

This could become a long topic.

You think so? 

Oh, definitely so. 

You could be right. 

[Hedgetrimmer]

Frosties, have you spotted your error yet? (There's more mileage to be had from this yet...    )

[Frosties]

Frosties, have you spotted your error yet? (There's more mileage to be had from this yet...    )

Errrr, nope.....can't see it Nick. Enlighten me Yoda 

[risticuss]

Surely Yoda isn't the best person to be giving advice on grammar.

[unfazed]

I two yoosed to bee pedantique abought grammer & spelling !
Seriously though, language is constantly evolving and changing-just look at the way people spoke/wrote 100/200/300 years ago.
Was taught English grammar in the 50s & 60s-find it difficult to have a conversation with some modern kids with their excessive use of "like" & "innit" 

I have to agree with you Dave. My pet hate hates are: 'I seen', 'I done' and the excess use of 'basically' 

Nick, looks like you will have to give Frosties a course in English grammar correction.

[Fazerider]

Surely Yoda isn't the best person to be giving advice on grammar.

Use an apostrophe-s to denote a plural do you? Teach you we shall. Clear the rules are. To indicate the possessive or contraction it is used only. Required apostrophes are not when you want to pluralise.

[Buzz]

One of my favourite T-Shirts...

Details tumblr m54fx7lRuu1r3vyd8o1 500

tumblr m54fx7lRuu1r3vyd8o1 500

[Skippernick]

Surely Yoda isn't the best person to be giving advice on grammar.

Use an apostrophe-s to denote a plural do you? Teach you we shall. Clear the rules are. To indicate the possessive or contraction it is used only. Required apostrophes are not when you want to pluralise.

I instantly read that with a Yoda voice

[Frosties]

I two yoosed to bee pedantique abought grammer & spelling !
Seriously though, language is constantly evolving and changing-just look at the way people spoke/wrote 100/200/300 years ago.
Was taught English grammar in the 50s & 60s-find it difficult to have a conversation with some modern kids with their excessive use of "like" & "innit" 

I have to agree with you Dave. My pet hate hates are: 'I seen', 'I done' and the excess use of 'basically' 

Nick, looks like you will have to give Frosties a course in English grammar correction.

Statement mine that not is. Wrong where I did go Crispy? (This Yoda speak is feckin hard  )

[Doddsie]

.

[unfazed]

.

 

[Frosties]

.

 

     FFS. 

[Fazerider]

.

 

     FFS. 

It's the blind leading the blind now.