Sorry I havent logged in for a while, so lost the drift a bit. Graham, I was a qualified observer in a reasonable sized group, a group with more observers than associates tbh, which was one issue. The problem I encountered was not the attitude of the keen young recruits ( like thee ,and me back then) but the silly old tossers who just would not accept change. They were more right wing than david cameroon. And tbh their attitude killed it for me. Many younger guys just got their qualification and left. Maybe I should rejoin and see if its any better...but my suspicion is it wont be.
I do agree than biking needs an advanced training cadre , which while preaching some gospel, wont be bible bashing ! For my own end I did take away a lot of very crucial advanced riding tips, but also do agree that much can be interpreted and adopted a bit too parrot fashion. I evolved my riding style from a curious mixture of IAM,self education over 25 yrs of riding , race schools, books and lots of trackdays. An eclectic mix which maybe suited me, but not everyone..
My basic premise in replying to your post is a concern, that just maybe you put the IAM on a pedestal, that somehow riding at or even beyond your own limit is a good thing so long as its while doing an IAM/ police thing. My thoughts are, stand back, ride at yer own pace, glean the important stuff, develop your own riding style.
I have ridden with several police riders and tbh they dont ride that fast normally. They obviously have more talent than they always show, but tbh dont judge ability just by speed alone.....its safe riding at speed - they know when to back off ...and this is my whole point ......you have to build up to it, not just expect that having an IAM qualifies or even prepares you to ride fast.The single biggest thing I took away from the IAM, and my riding experience is ......have the courage and confidance to back off if you dont feel 100% comfortable. You dont get second chances at high speed.Trouble is, many folk see this as a weakness not a strength.