![]() |
R6 Shock - RMT1983 - Positive Feedback - Printable Version +- Fazer Owners Club - Unofficial (https://foc-u.co.uk/mybb) +-- Forum: Bikes, Hints'n'Tips (https://foc-u.co.uk/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=66) +--- Forum: Fazer 1000/FZ1 corner (https://foc-u.co.uk/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=75) +--- Thread: R6 Shock - RMT1983 - Positive Feedback (/showthread.php?tid=83638) |
R6 Shock - RMT1983 - Positive Feedback - EarlOfEasycore - 04-09-24 The time finally came after 55000 miles and 22 years, my venerable Fazer needed its shock replaced, so I managed to find RMT1983's listing for R6 shock and dogbones on ebay (I had a voucher code I was itching to use, so I'm so glad I did). The rebound damping was progressively worsening, but not to the point where the bike was unrideable; you just knew that it wasn't going to track predictably into and out of corners. Given where I live in the Forest of Dean, the state of Mark Harper's roads leaves something to be desired, so rather than tolerating mediocre, worsening handling, I thought I'd figure out what all the fuss was about. Order got despatched when it was supposed to and ended up on my door 24 hours later, so props to Richard for getting it sorted (he did advise he wasn't going to be around when I clicked through ebay, but I didn't mind the wait) ![]() First thing's first - Time to hot glue gun the washers onto the upper shock mount bushing, just so I won't fill up my swear jar when fitting the R6 shock. ![]() After soaking the mounting hardware in penetrating fluid, noting that the nuts may not have been detorqued since the day it left Japan, and trying to find the easiest way to access the upper mounting bolt, the shock was eventually out. It's defintely seen better days. ![]() Took the opportunity to grease the roller bearings and attend to the pitting. I was expecting a lot worse than what came out, given that my 07 R1's linkage was graunchy AF when I replaced my rear for a Nitron R2. A little bit of pitting was tolerable and cleaned up nicely. ![]() Installation is the opposite of reverse, other than the fact that the 10kg weight plate I had used to jack up the wheel was a few mm too narrow to enable the final linkage bolt on the dog bone to slot in without much persuasion or the bearing inner ring from being axially displaced. But once fully installed and torqued up to 40Nm, it was all grand ![]() I took it for a quick 10 mile test drive around my local bump B roads and twisties, trying my best to test the handling against the free roaming sheep and wild boar and noted the following. - I'd need to get some recommended settings for a 14 stone rider front and rear; twisty and hilly A/B roads. Obviously, I'd dial in the sag first, so if anybody has any reference values, it would be useful. - The bike felt more composed on corner entry and exit. Back end wouldn't squat as much under acceleration, allowing me to roll on the throttle earlier. It just tracks over the undulation a bit better. That's most definitely expected, now that the shock has a damping circuit that isn't comprised of expired 22 year old damping fluid. - There isn't that latent understeer on fast sweepers, meaning that I can trust the bike a bit more; useful coming into autumn and winter. I now have greater feedback on weight transfer and steering. - Despite pulling the forks up through the yokes by 5mm, I may have to increase the compression damping or preload, just so the front doesn't dive as much and make it feel balanced with the rear. I did get my bike mechanic to rebuild the forks 4000 miles ago when the stanchions and seals went. - Given that the Fazer was only meant to be a commuting hack, I've put 10 times as many miles on this thing in the last 3 years than my R1, even on weekend blasts. I just find it more comfortable and flexible. Weird to think I've had her for 7 years. Was thinking about replacing it for a Speed Triple (either 1200 or 1050) or Tuono 1000/1100, but this bike owes me nothing and is ergonomically tweaked to my preferences. I might be getting old, having had IL4 sportsbikes the past 19 years, but just a few light touches and refreshes here and there means that I've got a purposeful, usable bike I can daily drive without fear of anything malfunctioning. As for Richard, well, it's a 2 thumbs up from me ![]() ![]() ![]() - RE: R6 Shock - RMT1983 - Positive Feedback - Trebus - 05-09-24 Nice write up. Got an R6 shock myself and makes such a difference. Devilsyam legacy lives on. RE: R6 Shock - RMT1983 - Positive Feedback - EarlOfEasycore - 06-09-24 (05-09-24, 10:30 PM)Gaz66 Wrote: Welcome to the R6 shock club, had one on mine for yrs. This is definitely insightful and useful! I'll get my wife to help me out on that. We're quite used to setting the settings on our mountain bikes, so your bit about the damping circuits and adjustment makes perfect sense. In principle, once the static sag is set and your desired rebound is dialled in, it's a case of refining the damping as per your guidance, which is really helpful. I've got a bit of experience setting suspension, albeit on mountain bikes, so transposing with your guidance is helpful. I've got a very useful 5 mile loop from my hosue that's got everything from rough surfaces, fast sweepers, undulations and sharp bends, so I'll be using that to dial in the damping. Likewise with compression damping - There's not going to be much need to wind in high speed comp, given that big hits and high amplitude strokes aren't going to be much of an issue with the sort of riding I'm planning to do (It's not as if I'm going to hit a 6ft drop or a 20ft gap jump on the bike). Pulling the forks through the yokes by 5mm from flush feels really nice for me. The turn in is at a point where it's predictable and neutral. However, reading a 10 year old post on front fork setting when some Czech chap was trying to chase the tail with the damping, would it be worthwhile to just get some linear 10.0N springs? The relationship between compression and rebound was mentioned there too. What I took from that is that the standard dual rate fork springs is an absolute bugger to get a reasonable setting with, since most will add a bit too much compression to stop the diving, at the detriment to rebound. I've used a rudimentary calculator online that uses generic wet weight (I've assumed 250kg for a fully fuelled bike) and rider weight (95kg in kit) and style of bike, as well as riding style (normal road) to arrive at the spring rate. Again, not too fussed with going to linear springs - I remember when I took my 929 Blade to Perry Leask at HM Racing, it was generally considered to ditch the "progressive" springs and obtain a better set up with linear. But yeah, thanks for your useful pointers - I'll have a look at the clearance when I'm setting the sag with the wife and get the dremel ready. RE: R6 Shock - RMT1983 - Positive Feedback - EarlOfEasycore - 12-03-25 I thought I'd follow up. After speaking Chris at Calsport (long friend of mine from bikechatforums), he was able to do me a deal on the hyperpro dual rate kit and 10W. Again, I would think that I'd fit into the Japanese distribution bell curve of 95% ile riders, and I'm not going to be finessing the suspension adjusters to find the nth degree of subjective feedback. In terms of the spring rates, OEM left and Hyperpro right. 170mm air gap, preload, rebound and compression settings as per the hyperpro build sheet, I find the bike still very compliant on the really rough and chundery surfaces around the Forest of Dean, so it's got that nice "off the top" compliance, but also giving sufficient support under hard braking whilst removing the understeer on corner exit due to the bike squatting. Given how poorly most people speak of the OE compression circuit, I took Chris' feedback with regards to the hyperpro kit and pulled the trigger. It's rather telling that hyperpro recommend running the compression either fully open or 5 clicks from fully open, which is a stark contrast to how the FAQ guide recommends it being set up. I'd say Trigger's broom is running well, for not a lot of investment in terms of time and effort on a Saturday. Ironically, I've not had a chance to ride my R1 since I installled the new forks on it with Matris Dampers, to make a comparison! That being said, I'm thinking that the Fazer's set up is bob on for the road. ![]() ![]() RE: R6 Shock - RMT1983 - Positive Feedback - emicoyou - 06-04-25 (04-09-24, 07:46 PM)EarlOfEasycore Wrote: The time finally came after 55000 miles and 22 years, my venerable Fazer needed its shock replaced, so I managed to find RMT1983's listing for R6 shock and dogbones on ebay (I had a voucher code I was itching to use, so I'm so glad I did). The rebound damping was progressively worsening, but not to the point where the bike was unrideable; you just knew that it wasn't going to track predictably into and out of corners. Given where I live in the Forest of Dean, the state of Mark Harper's roads leaves something to be desired, so rather than tolerating mediocre, worsening handling, I thought I'd figure out what all the fuss was about. Order got despatched when it was supposed to and ended up on my door 24 hours later, so props to Richard for getting it sorted (he did advise he wasn't going to be around when I clicked through ebay, but I didn't mind the wait) It seriously transforms the ride quality on the Fazer – way more stable and responsive now. If you're considering it, just go for it; you won't regret it! |