+- Fazer Owners Club - Unofficial (https://foc-u.co.uk/mybb)
+-- Forum: General (https://foc-u.co.uk/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=65)
+--- Forum: General (https://foc-u.co.uk/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=69)
+--- Thread: No sympathy for Gunmen (/showthread.php?tid=77172)
No sympathy for Gunmen - celticdog - 04-01-17
A drug dealer was shot by police in a planned operation. Local MP's calling for calm etc...
All the would be gangsters out there need to realise that the biggest gang in town rightly is in fact the Police.
I feel for his family, but if you want to play gangsta expect to get shot.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-38505164
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - Dudeofrude - 04-01-17
Couldn't agree more. Pisses me right off how everyone gets up in arms when some "innocent" offender gets shot dead.
At the end of it the police dont just show up, get out the car and shoot. The suspects are always given multiple chances to do as they are told and obviously refuse so they get what they deserve.
I don't know about you but if I was (for some reason) strolling down the street with a weapon and the police showed up pointing guns at me i'd do as I was damn well told!!
The story's always the same. The person shot was always 'a great guy' or a 'promising young student' and never associated with gangs. Just always 'in the wrong place at the wrong time'
strange that, isn't it?
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - Bretty - 04-01-17
(04-01-17, 02:59 PM)Dudeofrude link Wrote: ".... suspects are always given multiple chances to do as they are told...
That's not completely true. It depends on the intelligence, if the police believe they may have a firearm, there have been a few well know instances where the police have just shot first, without shouting a command or seeing a gun.
Although I do agree, drug dealers with guns deserve everything they get, regardless of the colour of their skin.
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - BBROWN1664 - 04-01-17
In the most recent case, it looks like an unmarked police Merc forcibly stopped the guys Audi. Chances are they thought the guy was about to shoot someone so, in these cases, no warning would be given, they would neutralise the gunman.
From the news yesterday, it looks like they did indeed find a gun in the car. the only question now is did the guys prints get on it pre or post mortem? :pokefun
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - VNA - 04-01-17
Quote:the biggest gang in town rightly is in fact the Police.
Yeah well, that just might be the problem.
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - Frosties - 04-01-17
Quote from the online Guardian from the twats fucktard dad
"[color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]Yassar Yaqub, who was acquitted of attempted murder in 2010 when the case against him fell apart at court, was two years ago treated for shotgun wounds when a gunman targeted him outside his family home. Neighbours and former associates painted him as a drugs kingpin who bought high-powered sports cars with the proceeds of crime, and his friends described him following his death as “no angel”.[/color][/size][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]But his father insisted that his son had “never been convicted of any drugs or firearms offence” and suggested that he attracted interest from the police due to the people he associated with."............[/color]aaaaaahhhhhhh fuck off dad you mad mullah :grumble
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - mtread - 04-01-17
Did you not watch the Mark Duggan documentary? If you want the police to ambush and shoot dead minor criminals, I suggest you go visit the Philippines.
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - darrsi - 05-01-17
(04-01-17, 08:16 PM)VNA link Wrote:Quote:the biggest gang in town rightly is in fact the Police.
Yeah well, that just might be the problem.
Yeah, well you just might be a consistently argumentative bastard for arguments sake?
Who knows?
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - darrsi - 05-01-17
(04-01-17, 10:01 PM)Frosties link Wrote: Quote from the online Guardian from the twats fucktard dad
"[color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]Yassar Yaqub, who was acquitted of attempted murder in 2010 when the case against him fell apart at court, was two years ago treated for shotgun wounds when a gunman targeted him outside his family home. Neighbours and former associates painted him as a drugs kingpin who bought high-powered sports cars with the proceeds of crime, and his friends described him following his death as “no angel”.[/color][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]But his father insisted that his son had “never been convicted of any drugs or firearms offence” and suggested that he attracted interest from the police due to the people he associated with."............[/color]aaaaaahhhhhhh fuck off dad you mad mullah :grumble
I'm with you on this one, he thought he had it all and is now dead at 28 through unnatural reasons as a direct result of his way of life.
One less scumbag ruining the kids on the streets and profiting from it.
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - lew600fazer - 05-01-17
As Billy Connolly said about suicide bombers, the world is just another fucking wanker short.
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - Grahamm - 05-01-17
(04-01-17, 02:59 PM)Dudeofrude link Wrote: Couldn't agree more. Pisses me right off how everyone gets up in arms when some "innocent" offender gets shot dead.
Yeah, and Jean Charles de Menezes was foreign, so he must have been guilty of something and the Police would never have fed false stories to the media and lied about what happened...
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - darrsi - 05-01-17
Crikey, by the way these tossers are speaking and acting you'd think they'd just shot Phillip Schofield or the like. :rolleyes
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/575502/m62-police-shooting-huddersfield-Mohammed-Yassar-Yaqub-dad-dad-protest-demand-justice-mark
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/575166/M62-police-shooting-Huddersfield-Mohammed-Yassar-Yaqub-gun-incidents
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - esetest - 05-01-17
The times we live in unfortunately , due to the increased threat of terrorism if the Police think you have a gun they will shoot to kill .
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - mtread - 05-01-17
Support Police shoot to kill? Be very careful what you wish for. The IPCC investigation will probably find (again) that the victim posed no threat at the time. Of course the police make mistakes. What they are not good at is admitting them.
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - BBROWN1664 - 05-01-17
The trouble with being an armed plod is you are damned if you shoot and damned when you don't.
If they had not opened fire and the guy in the car did have a gun and shot a copper the world would be in uproar asking wht the armed plod didn't neutralise the treat before an innocent person got shot.
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - Bretty - 05-01-17
Shoot first ask questions later...
http://m.huffpost.com/uk/entry/uk_586df7c2e4b00729cab30968
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - lew600fazer - 05-01-17
Innocent people in society do not carry guns , at least not in the UK.
Yeah, and Jean Charles de Menezes was foreign, so he must have been guilty of something and the Police would never have fed false stories to the media and lied about what happened...
This was when London was on high alert after the 7/7 bombings and yes this was a bloody disgrace, 7 shots to the head and 11 shots fired in all. But sadly the world we live in today !!!! Always a shame when someone totally innocent is killed especially by the police, but what about the innocents of Tunisia, Paris, Brussels, Nice, Berlin etc.
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - BBROWN1664 - 05-01-17
:agree
mistakes happen and shouldn't need to be covered up. In the UK we see far less gun crime than in other countries (OK not all other countries) and our intelligence services do a great job in foiling attacks by going in heavy handed to prevent innocent people getting hurt.
There are many many more armed situations where plod/security services have quickly and quietly taken armed people into custody than you will ever hear about. You only hear about the "poor innocent Ramjam, would never hurt anyone" type incidents because its a bit hard to hide a bullet riddled car on a busy motorway while they do the necessary follow up investigations.
I mean, having shot the git, why not get the car shifted out of the public eye and into a warehouse somewhere rather than spend nearly 24 hours taking photos etc of the scene? the reason, they need to cover their arses in case "poor innocent Ramjams" family want to take matters further.
what they should have done is shift the car and just list the git as "missing" having fed him into a crematorium furnace overnight. That will make the family wait 7 years for any insurance pay-out too
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - mtread - 05-01-17
Taking a life is an important decision, and sometimes it is necessary. Their rules are quite clear. As said, what the police are not very good at is admitting mistakes. They cover up, conspire and lie.
Re: No sympathy for Gunmen - esetest - 05-01-17
(05-01-17, 11:19 AM)mtread link Wrote: Support Police shoot to kill? Be very careful what you wish for. The IPCC investigation will probably find (again) that the victim posed no threat at the time. Of course the police make mistakes. What they are not good at is admitting them.I didn't say I support the Police shoot to kill policy , the Police carry out the orders of the liberal elite who feed us the bullshit that we live in a free society .