![]() |
BREXIT - Printable Version +- Fazer Owners Club - Unofficial (https://foc-u.co.uk/mybb) +-- Forum: General (https://foc-u.co.uk/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=65) +--- Forum: General (https://foc-u.co.uk/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=69) +--- Thread: BREXIT (/showthread.php?tid=80202) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
|
Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - VNA - 24-01-19 Indeed. Charges have been passed to the Procurator Fiscal. Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - steve 10562cc - 24-01-19 Not right to comment further till after the trial. Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - agricola - 24-01-19 (24-01-19, 01:06 PM)VNA link Wrote:Quote:You seem to be oblivious to political events in Scotland, perhaps you're focusing too hard on events here. Let me enlighten you. The First Minister of Scotland is facing a misconduct investigation for holding a series of meetings with a former First Minister of Scotland, who was recently under investigation himself, but has been successful in his judicial review of the allegations made against him. Why the First Minister felt the need to claim these meetings were unofficial, when government officials were present, at here home, has yet to be revealed. Nope, I was absolutely bang on, it was a review of the allegations, not an inquiry of the allegations. You are just too keen to pick fault. Ihm suprized ur not corecting evriwons grama! Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - dazza - 24-01-19 (24-01-19, 08:26 PM)steve 10562cc link Wrote: Not right to comment further till after the trial.Ah shit....You had to go and say it, didn't you. :lol Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - VNA - 24-01-19 Quote:Nope, I was absolutely bang on, it was a review of the allegations, not an inquiry of the allegations.Nope sorry you don't have a clue. :lol Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - steve 10562cc - 24-01-19 So she really is little jimmy cranky Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - agricola - 24-01-19 (24-01-19, 08:51 PM)VNA link Wrote:Quote:Nope, I was absolutely bang on, it was a review of the allegations, not an inquiry of the allegations.Nope sorry I don't have a clue. :lol Neither do I Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - VNA - 24-01-19 Quote:Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread « Reply #1804 on: Today at 07:51:17 PM » Quote<blockquote>Nope, I was absolutely bang on, it was a review of the allegations, not an inquiry of the allegations.</blockquote> Quote:Nope sorry you don't have a clue. [img alt=:lol]http://foc-u.co.uk/Smileys/efocicon/lol.gif[/img]Agricola, Mr Salmond quit the SNP and brought a legal action against the government. It was a judicial review into government procedure. Mr Salmond alleged that the government did not correctly implement it’s own investigative procedures. He won his case. You stated, Quote:a former First Minister of Scotland, who was recently under investigation himself, but has been successful in his judicial review of the allegations made against him.There has been no judicial review into the allegations made against Mr Salmond. Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - agricola - 24-01-19 (24-01-19, 09:50 PM)VNA link Wrote:Quote:Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread « Reply #1804 on: Today at 07:51:17 PM » Quote<blockquote>Nope, I was absolutely bang on, it was a review of the allegations, not an inquiry of the allegations.</blockquote>Quote:Nope sorry you don't have a clue. [img alt=:lol]http://foc-u.co.uk/Smileys/efocicon/lol.gif[/img]Agricola, Mr Salmond quit the SNP and brought a legal action against the government. It was a judicial review into government procedure. Mr Salmond alleged that the government did not correctly implement it’s own investigative procedures. He won his case. Fuck me! :eek [/size]Mr Salmond initiated a judicial review which found that the Scottish Govt, as you correctly stated, cocked up. My understanding is, and I'm sure you will correct me if i am wrong, that those allegations are now unlikely to be continued as the process was tainted. [/size] [/size]Now, you and I could argue the toss about the correct legal terminology until the desert sands turn to ice and the camels come skating home, but that'll just make me look like a boring twat like you, so i'm not going to. [/size] [/size]Good evening [/size] [/size] [/size] [/size][size=78%] [/size] Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - ogri48 - 24-01-19 (24-01-19, 08:47 PM)dazza link Wrote: [quote author=steve 10562cc link=topic=24678.msg291238#msg291238 date=1548358014]Ah shit....You had to go and say it, didn't you. :lol [/quote] lol now thats foccing funny... :lol :lol Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - VNA - 24-01-19 Quote:Mr Salmond initiated a judicial review which found that the Scottish Govt, as you correctly stated, cocked up.He resinged from the SNP. He then brought a judical review against the government. His complaint was that they did not correctly follow their own proceedure. He won. The judical review did not consider the allegations against Mr Salmond and made no comment on them. The allegations stand. Today Mr Salmond was arrested by the Scottish police force on the basis of those allegations. Mr Salmond has been charged. Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - VNA - 24-01-19 ![]() Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - mtread - 24-01-19 So now to add Airbus to the No Deal disaster club, with Sony Dyson Honda Toyota and all the others. Yet the 'stupid woman' is still not listening Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - VNA - 25-01-19 Quote:Yet the 'stupid woman' is still not listening ![]() Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - darrsi - 25-01-19 Theresa May :lol https://youtu.be/ZiQGA48uY-g Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - YamFazFan - 25-01-19 (24-01-19, 11:50 PM)mtread link Wrote: Yet the 'stupid woman' is still not listening She's not listening to an oportunistic marxist for sure. I don't blame her. The minute he starts dictating policy we've all had it. Corbyn's just looking for any excuse to shirk and wriggle out of making a true commitment one way or the other outside of No Deal. He knows she won't take it off the agenda and in turn it gives him an excuse to refuse to talk. Labour are trying to be Leave in the north and Remain in the south. Everybody knows 'No Deal' isn't going to happen. It's been left on the agenda purely for negotiating reasons and to gee Parliament along towards accepting a deal. Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - mtread - 25-01-19 If everybody knows that No Deal isn't going to happen, how can it be a negotiating position? Or are the Tory MPs who need to be won over that stupid? Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - VNA - 25-01-19 Quote:If everybody knows that No Deal isn't going to happen, how can it be a negotiating position?Yeah I too would like to know how that makes sense. If it ain't gonna happen. Take it off the table. And buisiness can stop wasting millions of pounds everyday making NO DEAL preparations, and jobs will be so much safer. Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - VNA - 25-01-19 Meanwhile here’s BREXIT hero Tim Martin being interviewed by Owen Jones. Tim complains about EU laws, but guess what, just like the BREXIT foccers here, he can’t name one law he opposes. Watch him squirm too when Owen asks about rates of pay at Weatherspoons. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJ2BMEMiO9s Re: Just for VNA a brexit thread - YamFazFan - 25-01-19 (25-01-19, 12:20 PM)mtread link Wrote: If everybody knows that No Deal isn't going to happen, how can it be a negotiating position? Or are the Tory MPs who need to be won over that stupid? No Deal is the default position. As things stand, if nothing happens between now and 29th March we're out with No Deal. We all know that there's less than a chance in a million of that happening, but it's NOT completely impossible. That's why. |