+- Fazer Owners Club - Unofficial (https://foc-u.co.uk/mybb)
+-- Forum: General (https://foc-u.co.uk/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=65)
+--- Forum: General (https://foc-u.co.uk/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=69)
+--- Thread: Union power (/showthread.php?tid=67196)
Re: Union power - Hamos - 14-03-14
This is a quote Boris should have made, " I won't shed one single tear over his death. He tried to destroy the London Underground and commerce in London, and as far as I'm concerned he can rot in hell" Boris commenting on Bob Crow's death. I'm pretty sure that is what he would be thinking!
Re: Union power - VNA - 15-03-14
I don't think that's what he would be thinking, Boris might give the impression of being a bit of a buffoon, but it's just an act and a distraction.
The problem with what Boris said, and perhaps Boris thought people would too stupid to notice, is that yes, Bob was indeed an honourable man and one that stuck up for his members. It's very revealing that Boris should say so, and I do believe he meant what he said.
Re: Union power - risticuss - 15-03-14
Inappropriate topics for dinner conversion,
Religion and politics,
You'll always upset someone...
Re: Union power - johnnyg - 16-03-14
Too true! Religion and politics the biggest precipitants of mass murder in history.
Re: Union power - ChristoT - 16-03-14
(16-03-14, 12:28 AM)johnnyg link Wrote: Too true! Religion and politics the biggest precipitants of mass murder in history.
Oh shit here we go... :lurk
Re: Union power - VNA - 16-03-14
Bob Crow in pictures;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/in-pictures-26526515
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/gallery/2014/mar/11/bob-crow-a-life-in-pictures
Re: Union power - slimwilly - 16-03-14
do any unionists take any notice of what the general puplics veiw is?
Re: Union power - esetest - 16-03-14
The unions job is to protect its members , not to curry favour with Joe Public .
Re: Union power - VNA - 16-03-14
Quote:do any unionists take any notice of what the general puplics veiw is?
Trade Unionists are the general public.
Re: Union power - mtread - 16-03-14
Quote:Trade Unionists are the general public.
Unfortunately a dwindling proportion .......
Capitalism is about maximizing profit and to distribute it between the owners of the capital. The main way of achieving that is to minimise the cost of production, which in a labour intensive industry means reducing the workforce and suppressing wages.
Hence the need for unions.
Re: Union power - Simon.Pieman - 17-03-14
(16-03-14, 11:29 PM)mtread link Wrote: Capitalism is about maximizing profit and to distribute it between the owners of the capital. The main way of achieving that is to minimise the cost of production, which in a labour intensive industry means reducing the workforce and suppressing wages.
I'd like to point out that there is nothing wrong with owning the capital. I could spend my free capital on a new motorboat but I have invested in a little import/export concern which currently has two lads working 3 days a week (soon to be 5 days)
People can be a little too polarized when it comes to capitalism v socialism or whatever politic.
Re: Union power - VNA - 17-03-14
Britain's five richest families worth more than poorest 20%
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/mar/17/oxfam-report-scale-britain-growing-financial-inequality
Re: Union power - mtread - 17-03-14
Quote:I'd like to point out that there is nothing wrong with owning the capital. I could spend my free capital on a new motorboat but I have invested in a little import/export concern which currently has two lads working 3 days a week (soon to be 5 days)And someone else will have had to have made that motorboat, providing employment.....
People can be a little too polarized when it comes to capitalism v socialism or whatever politic.
This isn't a 'capitalism v socialism' issue, it's basic economics. Nothing wrong with capital being reinvested, that's the point of it. But as I said, to maximise capital you have to either sell at a higher price, increase production and therefore demand, or reduce costs. Unfortunately, the latter seems to be in fashion. Hence the need for unions.
Re: Union power - esetest - 17-03-14
And eventually there is nothing left to cut , and your pot is empty .
(17-03-14, 10:01 PM)mtread link Wrote:Quote:I'd like to point out that there is nothing wrong with owning the capital. I could spend my free capital on a new motorboat but I have invested in a little import/export concern which currently has two lads working 3 days a week (soon to be 5 days)And someone else will have had to have made that motorboat, providing employment.....
People can be a little too polarized when it comes to capitalism v socialism or whatever politic.
This isn't a 'capitalism v socialism' issue, it's basic economics. Nothing wrong with capital being reinvested, that's the point of it. But as I said, to maximise capital you have to either sell at a higher price, increase production and therefore demand, or reduce costs. Unfortunately, the latter seems to be in fashion. Hence the need for unions.
Re: Union power - mtread - 17-03-14
And I need to point out that one of the most successful British companies, John Lewis Partnership/Waitrose, is 'socialist'. A workers' co-operative, the board is made up of workers' representatives, and all of the capital produced by way of profits is shared amongst the workforce, not paid to shareholders.
Re: Union power - lew600fazer - 18-03-14
(17-03-14, 11:46 PM)mtread link Wrote: And I need to point out that one of the most successful British companies, John Lewis Partnership/Waitrose, is 'socialist'. A workers' co-operative, the board is made up of workers' representatives, and all of the capital produced by way of profits is shared amongst the workforce, not paid to shareholders.
So tell me do you bank with the Co op banking group then?????
Re: Union power - mtread - 18-03-14
Erm ....... I think you will find that since its last little 'problems' the Co-Op bank is no longer a cooperative, owned by its members :rolleyes
Nearest comparison is a Building Society like the Nationwide. But anyway they are all members co-operatives, not workers co-operatives.
As a customer of the Nationwide, you own part of the organisation. As a customer of Waitrose you don't.
As an employee of the Nationwide, you don't own part of the organisation. As an employee of Waitrose you do.
Re: Union power - Slaninar - 18-03-14
(17-03-14, 10:01 PM)mtread link Wrote: And someone else will have had to have made that motorboat, providing employment.....
What do you need employment for in this level of tech advance?!
You make 100.000 fazers and close the factory gates for the next 10 years. Go fishing.
Make blue jeans for all the people.
Capitalism is all about stupid things - like 1000 models of cars, clothes, services, and I see ordinary people doing 2 jobs and not spending time with kids, wifes - which should be the priority. At this level of tech advance, people should work for 2-4 hours tops, everything else is fake. Doing jobs they don't like to buy the things they don't really need.
Re: Union power - VNA - 18-03-14
What we seem to increasingly have is;
Multi-national companies that don't pay their corporation tax despite making massive profits, increasingly pay large sections of their workforce the minimum wage, now often on a zero hours contract, no paid holidays, no sick pay, no pensions, no benefits whatsoever, and whilst they stuff their boots with cash, those of us who are lucky enougth to have reasonably well paid jobs have to fork out via our taxes to support the employees of these big rich companies.
Re: Union power - nick crisp - 18-03-14
(17-03-14, 10:01 PM)mtread link Wrote: And someone else will have had to have made that motorboat, providing employment.....
This isn't a 'capitalism v socialism' issue, it's basic economics. Nothing wrong with capital being reinvested, that's the point of it. But as I said, to maximise capital you have to either sell at a higher price, increase production and therefore demand, or reduce costs. Unfortunately, the latter seems to be in fashion. Hence the need for unions.
That's NOT basic economics. You increase production to suit an increase in demand. Increasing production does not create demand.