old - Fazer Owners Club - old

Bikes, Hints'n'Tips => FZS600 Fazer => Topic started by: yambam46 on 18 May 2012, 12:47:55 pm

Title: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: yambam46 on 18 May 2012, 12:47:55 pm
Right guys am gonna buy a new air filter as the one thats in is 12 year old so i thought id give her a treat !!
What do you guys think is better k and n which are slightly dearer(£30) or yamaha genuine part (£25.90)
Anyone notice any difference performance wise,fuel economy etc.
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: darrsi on 18 May 2012, 01:19:00 pm
12 year old air filter, seriously ???
I've always stuck with the original ones personally, but i don't think your bike will care, it'll just take a big gasp for air and be thankful.....lol   
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Gnasher on 18 May 2012, 01:35:27 pm
Put in the K&N it will clean up the low to mid range very nicely giving you improved throttle response  :)
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: yambam46 on 18 May 2012, 02:27:36 pm
hA ha ha, had to get my moneys worth out it !! K and Ns for me i think might get 20 year out that  :lol !!!!! cheers !!
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Motorbreath on 18 May 2012, 03:02:27 pm
12 years  :eek

Put in the K&N it will clean up the low to mid range very nicely giving you improved throttle response  :)

I think the same (BMC in my bike). I also cut the inlet plastic from the cap. Maybe it is just our imagination but the air intake noise is louder, that's great.

There are also paper ones, made by aftermarket brands, just like the OEM one, but much cheaper.

Anybody else has messed with the cap silencer?
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Slaninar on 18 May 2012, 05:03:55 pm
I think the same (BMC in my bike). I also cut the inlet plastic from the cap. Maybe it is just our imagination but the air intake noise is louder, that's great.

There are also paper ones, made by aftermarket brands, just like the OEM one, but much cheaper.

Anybody else has messed with the cap silencer?


OFF TOPIC:
Spaniard, from your recent posts, I wander what part of your Fazer is left in original state? You've created a monster! :)
You can chase Ninjas, R6s, CBRrs, Gixxers etc with Fazer now?  :)

OP:
K&N (or BMC - whichever is easier to find). Best thing.
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Motorbreath on 18 May 2012, 05:55:22 pm
Haha I do not know, I'd like to test a full standard one, maybe I have just ruined it :lol .

Really I do not know I just chase faster bikes like everybody does, it is more related to rider's capability (and craziness  :lol ).
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: clayt74 on 18 May 2012, 06:30:05 pm
Haha I do not know, I'd like to test a full standard one, maybe I have just ruined it :lol .

Really I do not know I just chase faster bikes like everybody does, it is more related to rider's capability (and craziness  :lol ).


a colleague of mine has an R6 and is an adrenalin/sports junkie!!! only been riding 2.5 years (first bike was his R6) race exhaust, power commander and dyno tuned.
he is insane and rides day to day as i never would :\
however around the B and small A roads, in our little somerset he cannot out do me on my FZS600??? his torque is too high up the rev range for him to keep it on the limit?
on long straights he leaves me for dust.
is it the fazers great range??? or just difference in style?? who knows?
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Motorbreath on 18 May 2012, 06:34:31 pm
That's why the FZS600 is the best road bike ever made. Also this year I only pay 100€ for insurance :eek , try that, sporty ones  :lol
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Slaninar on 19 May 2012, 05:18:43 am
That's why the FZS600 is the best road bike ever made. Also this year I only pay 100€ for insurance :eek , try that, sporty ones  :lol

In my country, insurance is based on CC only. So it is the same for all the bikes between 500 and 750 cc. It's around 200 euros per year for all the registration costs (technical correctness test, taxes, insurance etc).   

But R6 seating position and need for higher revs is just crap for most public roads - like a suicide machine.
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: keno on 19 May 2012, 10:31:00 am
Quote
That's why the FZS600 is the best road bike ever made. Also this year I only pay 100€ for insurance  , try that, sporty ones 


Cost me £35 for insurance last year for the 98 fazer & £86 for the 2006 zrx1200r.. 8)
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Motorbreath on 19 May 2012, 10:50:45 am
That's why the FZS600 is the best road bike ever made. Also this year I only pay 100€ for insurance :eek , try that, sporty ones  :lol

In my country, insurance is based on CC only. So it is the same for all the bikes between 500 and 750 cc. It's around 200 euros per year for all the registration costs (technical correctness test, taxes, insurance etc).   

But R6 seating position and need for higher revs is just crap for most public roads - like a suicide machine.

So you pay more for a Dragstar than for a R1?? :eek
My new company just do the opposite. They do not want to insure an old FZR600, but the are happy with the Suzuki B-king or Aprilia Tuono

Quote
That's why the FZS600 is the best road bike ever made. Also this year I only pay 100€ for insurance  , try that, sporty ones 


Cost me £35 for insurance last year for the 98 fazer & £86 for the 2006 zrx1200r.. 8)

Amazing. You cannot find those prices in Spain, for sure, no matter how old are you.
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: bwizz on 19 May 2012, 06:31:57 pm
Ive tried BMC and KN's on  my various 600's they are both better than standard. Improved midrange !
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Slaninar on 19 May 2012, 08:34:27 pm
So you pay more for a Dragstar than for a R1?? :eek

No. R1 is 1000 cc so it costs a bit more. 500 to 750 cc is about 200 euros. 750 to 1000 cc is about 230 euros. Under 250 cc costs about 100 euros.
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Motorbreath on 19 May 2012, 09:16:00 pm
I meant a Dragstar 1100, or a big harley :)
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Slaninar on 20 May 2012, 05:52:10 am
I meant a Dragstar 1100, or a big harley :)

I think that over 1000 cc it is some 20-30 euros more expensive than under 1000. So 1100 DragStar would cost some 260, while R1 would cost 230 per year registration insurance. Many people here ride R1. A saying goes: "R one, or none!"  :)
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: JZS 600 on 20 May 2012, 10:34:22 am
Had a moment of wierdness when I changed from a VFR 800 to the Fazer 600.
 
Insurance went up a fraction!
 
I was told that this was because the Fazer was in a different insurance bracket,,,, WTF?
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Slaninar on 20 May 2012, 01:40:16 pm
Had a moment of wierdness when I changed from a VFR 800 to the Fazer 600.
 
Insurance went up a fraction!
 
I was told that this was because the Fazer was in a different insurance bracket,,,, WTF?

Nothing strange: Honda is a safer, pensioner's bike, for slow old farts.   :rollin
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: solorider on 20 May 2012, 03:16:54 pm
I pay £136 for my fazer thou,I paid £22 more than my vfr750 a year.One thing you have to be carefull with the k&n is it can allow too much air through so I would not use one if you live in a dusty area
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Slaninar on 20 May 2012, 04:11:51 pm
I pay £136 for my fazer thou,I paid £22 more than my vfr750 a year.One thing you have to be carefull with the k&n is it can allow too much air through so I would not use one if you live in a dusty area

No, quite the contrary. KN is good at filtering dust, but doesn't get clogged so easily. It should do good in dusty conditions. No engine was damaged from dust let in through oiled and well maintained KN/BMC filter. Just old wives tale. Same as fully synthetic oil damaging "older" bikes.
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Dead Eye on 20 May 2012, 06:10:41 pm
Holy hell... I really can not wait until im a bit older and actually have some no claims discount - my insurance was £470! That was the cheapest I could find it :(

Mind you, I was 21 and had passed my test 4 days before getting my bike / insurance...


Just to note as well, im running a K&N Air Filter. I did change the entire exhaust system at the same time though so its impossible for me to say whether the Air Filter improved anything.
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: DaxPlusPlus on 20 May 2012, 08:07:34 pm
If I could pay £470 per year to be 21 again I'd gladly pay  ;) but I know what you mean - it's one of the better things about growing older.

I just got a Fazer and I'm paying £84 TPFF - with NO NCB  8) but again I know which I'd rather have.
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Andy FZS on 20 May 2012, 08:29:57 pm
My insurance also £82 without any NCB and I got £20 back by buying it through "Top cash back" so really only £62 but sadly I not 21 or even 21 the second time around.
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Dead Eye on 20 May 2012, 09:10:24 pm
Haha, this is very true. Oh the joys of being young... I'd say care free but thats not quite true ;)
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: fazersharp on 22 May 2012, 10:18:46 am
Anyyyyy hu backk to the op
I too have a 98 fazer still with origional air filter - done 13,000 miles. Had it for 10 years
Still as good as it ever was ---Unless it has degraded so very slowly as for me not to notice.
I do though have a new yam filter all ready to put in, so would be a good test to go for the same run befor and after   
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Gaz73 on 22 May 2012, 12:29:54 pm
I'm using the K&N filter, top job and you can puck them up a lot cheaper on eBay than the high street ;)
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Fazer Jake on 22 May 2012, 12:39:00 pm
Running K&N on mine, you can certainly hear it more, noticed a slight increase in low/mid range.
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: fazersharp on 23 May 2012, 12:24:21 pm
I thought that you had to re- jet or somthing if you fitted a K and N
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Dead Eye on 23 May 2012, 02:14:49 pm
If you really wanted to make the most out of it for track days etc then I guess you could, but for every day use its not required. As many have said, the Fazer tends to run a bit lean rich as standard so having more air shouldn't be too issuesome unless there is TOO much.

Regardless, I haven't needed to re-jet and ive not experienced any problems since having fitted mine.


Edit: Thanks to Gnasher for pointing out my stupid mistake... My theory was correct, just used the wrong terminology ;)
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Gnasher on 23 May 2012, 02:27:50 pm
the Fazer tends to run a bit lean as standard

No mate they run rich hence thats why you dont need to re-jet with a high flow filter :)
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Motorbreath on 23 May 2012, 02:41:07 pm
I think they run a bit rich too (too fuel for a given air) so the cotton filter and the open exhaust compensate. Also looking at the sizes of the Dynojet kit, I think it is leaner than the standard one (if I did not interpret it wrong), when it is richer in most of bikes. Can anybody verify this?

The last times that a mechanic or I looked at the spark plugs they looked fine but I bought my bike used with an insane can, so I do not know if the fueling was adjusted.

I ask again, anybody is cutting the intake silencer? :evil
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Gnasher on 23 May 2012, 03:33:54 pm
I think they run a bit rich too (too fuel for a given air) so the cotton filter and the open exhaust compensate. Also looking at the sizes of the Dynojet kit, I think it is leaner than the standard one (if I did not interpret it wrong), when it is richer in most of bikes. Can anybody verify this?

The last times that a mechanic or I looked at the spark plugs they looked fine but I bought my bike used with an insane can, so I do not know if the fueling was adjusted.

I ask again, anybody is cutting the intake silencer? :evil

Mate you can't get a jet kit for a FZS well not in the UK, you can get them in other counties mainly to correct emission jetting.
 
You can stick on ANY good quality end can and ANY high flow filter the standard jetting will coupe no problem, jet kits are there to allow for tuning modifications.  Most other carb bikes don't run as rich as the FZS so require jetting to run with a open can and filter.  The higher the stage the more tuning you can do i.e. engine the FZS really isn't worth tuning it's already very highly tuned, and would require serious money which just isn't worth it.
     
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Fuzzy on 23 May 2012, 03:53:16 pm
I have a K&N fitted and it's given me no problems at all, midrange is a little better but marginal.

As for insurance, I'm shocked by how cheap everybody's are. I pay £550 for TPFT with 3yrs no claims and that was the cheapest after hours of searching. I guess postcodes are important and one in London is not going to get you any discounts!
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Motorbreath on 23 May 2012, 04:48:55 pm
I think they run a bit rich too (too fuel for a given air) so the cotton filter and the open exhaust compensate. Also looking at the sizes of the Dynojet kit, I think it is leaner than the standard one (if I did not interpret it wrong), when it is richer in most of bikes. Can anybody verify this?

The last times that a mechanic or I looked at the spark plugs they looked fine but I bought my bike used with an insane can, so I do not know if the fueling was adjusted.

I ask again, anybody is cutting the intake silencer? :evil

 
Mate you can't get a jet kit for a FZS well not in the UK, you can get them in other counties mainly to correct emission jetting.
 
You can stick on ANY good quality end can and ANY high flow filter the standard jetting will coupe no problem, jet kits are there to allow for tuning modifications.  Most other carb bikes don't run as rich as the FZS so require jetting to run with a open can and filter.  The higher the stage the more tuning you can do i.e. engine the FZS really isn't worth tuning it's already very highly tuned, and would require serious money which just isn't worth it.
     


Not sure, I think the emissions law is the same for the whole EU, and the bike wasn't exported to the USA. Their data sheet says they are mostly for stock bike, so the kit would just fix the fuel excess when stock. You can download it from here:
http://www.dynojet.com/jetkits/motorcycle/yamaha_euro.aspx (http://www.dynojet.com/jetkits/motorcycle/yamaha_euro.aspx)
So again it is proved that the fzs is the best bike ever, it even comes ready for cotton filters and race cans  :lol
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Gnasher on 23 May 2012, 05:12:54 pm
Mate EU bikes are different Swiss for sure and the Austrian I'm told are as well and there are some differences between other counties, remember the FZS is a 14 year old bike and EU countries had different levels then some still do!  The site in the link is EU not UK, if your bike is UK you will be wasting your money but it's your money!
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Motorbreath on 23 May 2012, 05:42:22 pm
OK, I thought that the Euro-1 was standard already, but I have just compared my spanish catalogues to english ones and the codes and sizes of the carburettors parts are the same. They changed over the years though (in both countries), in 2000 and 2002, so maybe not all of them run rich. My spanish 99 runs ok with original jets and race filter and can anyway.
Title: Re: whats better k and n or genuine part air filter ?
Post by: Dead Eye on 23 May 2012, 07:20:34 pm
the Fazer tends to run a bit lean as standard

No mate they run rich hence thats why you dont need to re-jet with a high flow filter :)

*facepalm* Yes, rich is what I meant, I did do a double take when I wrote it but it didn't twig  :rolleyes