personally i would of crushed the cars as well, its not as if they can't afford it.That'll learn them.
Quote from: Skippernick on 11 September 2012, 01:13:50 pmpersonally i would of crushed the cars as well, its not as if they can't afford it.That'll learn them.For speeding?!? That seems a bit harsh!
Quote from: Lawrence on 11 September 2012, 01:41:40 pmQuote from: Skippernick on 11 September 2012, 01:13:50 pmpersonally i would of crushed the cars as well, its not as if they can't afford it.That'll learn them.For speeding?!? That seems a bit harsh!Yes that was the time they got caught, what about all the times they didn't get caught.
So no one on here with 600 to litre motorcycles don't ever break the speed limits?
Quote from: Strifae on 11 September 2012, 09:48:13 pmSo no one on here with 600 to litre motorcycles don't ever break the speed limits? mines a 599cc
I love this argument and who comes out for the rights of the speeder. It makes me chuckle.If crushing of the vehicle was the result of speeding by law then perhaps you wouldn't be so supportive of it.Yes i know all arguments, do it in a safe place etc, BUT it is still illegal.And yes i do exceed the speed limit where it is safe etc, BUT not in a 30, 40, 50 oh and 20 limit. So i am probably a hypocrite, but i also believe that i have more sense than some thrumped up little rich boy living off daddies hard work.
Quote from: Skippernick on 12 September 2012, 07:38:30 amI love this argument and who comes out for the rights of the speeder. It makes me chuckle.If crushing of the vehicle was the result of speeding by law then perhaps you wouldn't be so supportive of it.Yes i know all arguments, do it in a safe place etc, BUT it is still illegal.And yes i do exceed the speed limit where it is safe etc, BUT not in a 30, 40, 50 oh and 20 limit. So i am probably a hypocrite, but i also believe that i have more sense than some thrumped up little rich boy living off daddies hard work.I'm not supporting people speeding, I'm against your idea of 'get caught speeding one, get your car crushed'. It also states in the article that it was a 68mph (110kph) limit not a 20-50. Lastly, I'm not sure how you worked out, or how it's relevant, that they're 'living off daddies hard work' Moral of the story, speeding's bad, mmkay?
Quote from: Lawrence on 12 September 2012, 09:08:28 amQuote from: Skippernick on 12 September 2012, 07:38:30 amI love this argument and who comes out for the rights of the speeder. It makes me chuckle.If crushing of the vehicle was the result of speeding by law then perhaps you wouldn't be so supportive of it.Yes i know all arguments, do it in a safe place etc, BUT it is still illegal.And yes i do exceed the speed limit where it is safe etc, BUT not in a 30, 40, 50 oh and 20 limit. So i am probably a hypocrite, but i also believe that i have more sense than some thrumped up little rich boy living off daddies hard work.I'm not supporting people speeding, I'm against your idea of 'get caught speeding one, get your car crushed'. It also states in the article that it was a 68mph (110kph) limit not a 20-50. Lastly, I'm not sure how you worked out, or how it's relevant, that they're 'living off daddies hard work' Moral of the story, speeding's bad, mmkay? I agree and i like playing devils advocate. My point about the daddies hard work is that young rich people seem to have less sense in general and the people who can afford to race in gum ball, i believe theres a registration fee, have to have the money and car to take part. Lord knows i can't afford it. Why not rent the Nurburgring for the race?
From what I can gather there was both a bike and a car event near there over the weekend, certainly saw large groups of bikes,
Quote from: UG on 12 September 2012, 07:57:00 amQuote from: Strifae on 11 September 2012, 09:48:13 pmSo no one on here with 600 to litre motorcycles don't ever break the speed limits? mines a 599cc I stand corrected