There's that 1960s case (is it Moodeys?) where a car pulls out of a side street into the path of a filtering bike - the judge ruled it was the bike's fault as a twat in a car can not be expected to think (I'm paraphrasing).
Powell vs Moody was 80 / 20 in favour of the car driver, and is not superseeded by DvS as that relates to a U turn.
maybe it stime to have compulsory insurance for cyclists ?
maybe it stime to have compulsory insurance for cyclists ? they always claim they R hard done by, they R full road users etc etc ......time they shared in being insured too...
Quote from: pitternator on 19 December 2011, 07:37:22 ammaybe it stime to have compulsory insurance for cyclists ? they always claim they R hard done by, they R full road users etc etc ......time they shared in being insured too...do not feed the troll...
all this sort of thing says to me is ...its feckin dangerous to filter ! I hate doing it, though I can remember filtering miles recently when coming down M6 from Liverpool.Its a real dilemma. You just cant trust anyone, or relax at any time.I think towns are particularly bad since it all seems too acceptable and easy to do, folk get complacent. my opinion is the cyclist is to blame since he moved into a lane from the cover of the bus without checking its safe to do so. Lucky for him he got off so light.
Quote from: richfzs on 20 December 2011, 12:28:22 amQuote from: pitternator on 19 December 2011, 07:37:22 ammaybe it stime to have compulsory insurance for cyclists ? they always claim they R hard done by, they R full road users etc etc ......time they shared in being insured too...do not feed the troll... I agree with him, why shouldn't they have insurance. They cause enough accidents!!