We need to ditch BREXIT
Remain is on a roll
Quote<blockquote>Minford admits his model predicts that the policy would cause the ‘elimination’ of UK manufacturing and a large increase in wage inequality.</blockquote>So tell me YamFazFan do you want to see UK manufacturing eliminated?
What is it that you want YamFazFan,You never answered my question;QuoteQuote<blockquote>Minford admits his model predicts that the policy would cause the ‘elimination’ of UK manufacturing and a large increase in wage inequality.</blockquote>So tell me YamFazFan do you want to see UK manufacturing eliminated?
Quote from: VNA on 01 December 2018, 01:24:56 pmAnd can I come back to the one thing I think Minford is absolutely right about;QuoteMinford admits his model predicts that the policy would cause the ‘elimination’ of UK manufacturing and a large increase in wage inequality.I think Minford is absolutely wrong about that.
And can I come back to the one thing I think Minford is absolutely right about;QuoteMinford admits his model predicts that the policy would cause the ‘elimination’ of UK manufacturing and a large increase in wage inequality.
Minford admits his model predicts that the policy would cause the ‘elimination’ of UK manufacturing and a large increase in wage inequality.
That's what quite a few MP's are saying. I'm amazed how many of them don't appear to know that there's been a referendum or the result of it . Shocking really. You wouldn't think that there was anyone left in the UK who didn't know.
I think Minford is absolutely wrong about that.
QuoteI think Minford is absolutely wrong about that. So what you are doing is taking an economic model and cherry picking the bits you like and dismissing those you don’t.
Isn't that what you did too
QuoteI think Minford is absolutely wrong about that. So what you are doing is taking an economic model and cherry picking the bits you like and dismissing those you don’t. Ah, if only life could be like that.
If you count all EU regulations, EU-related Acts of Parliament, and EU-related Statutory Instruments, about 62% of laws introduced between 1993 and 2014 that apply in the UK implemented EU obligations.
Robert Oxley from Vote Leave says, [/size]"If you stacked the entire EU rule book it would be higher than Nelson's colum
Quote If you count all EU regulations, EU-related Acts of Parliament, and EU-related Statutory Instruments, about 62% of laws introduced between 1993 and 2014 that apply in the UK implemented EU obligations.I find that difficult to believe. What's your source? As pointed out, the 14% figure is research in the House of Commons LibraryQuoteRobert Oxley from Vote Leave says, [/size]"If you stacked the entire EU rule book it would be higher than Nelson's columWhich is of course typical Vote Leave hyperbole... [/size][size=78%] [/size]
Quote from: VNA on 04 December 2018, 08:52:44 PMQuoteI think Minford is absolutely wrong about that. So what you are doing is taking an economic model and cherry picking the bits you like and dismissing those you don’t. Ah, if only life could be like that. Quote from: VNA on 01 December 2018, 01:24:56 PM And can I come back to the one thing I think Minford is absolutely right about; QuoteMinford admits his model predicts that the policy would cause the ‘elimination’ of UK manufacturing and a large increase in wage inequality.
It's the possibility of Remain winning a second referendum that you need to really worry about. Does anyone seriously think it wouldn't be as close either way as the first one was? Leave will have had to win twice. Remain only have to win once. That's why they're so keen to have another crack at it If there were a second, the result would be binding. Say Remain win by 52% to 48%. That's the same as the margin Leave won by in the first referendum so it's a draw over the two rounds, but only the second one counts and then we're stuck in that rotten to the core institution forever. They'd be as ungracious in victory as they are in defeat. They would be rubbing Leaver's noses right in it. If Remain lost again I dread to think how low they would stoop in an attempt to overturn the democratic result again.
The formal legal recommendation cites Britain's "sovereignty" in treaty-making matters and says withdrawal "may be revoked at any time" during the negotiating period, as long as it is done in good faith.
Our democracy is alive and well.
They'd be as ungracious in victory as they are in defeat. They would be rubbing Leaver's noses right in it.