Hi,I’ve been riding my 2002 fzs600 for 4 years and decided to get my self a 2005 r6. I’ve not picked it up yet but am keeping the FZS for now, as its been a fantastic bike but due to me crashing it in the first year of owning it and fixing it myself, its still got some battle scars so would get pennies for what is still a fantastic mechanically sound bike.What’s your guys experience of an r6 against the fzs600. Things I’m expecting:To be gutless for majority of rev range but kick in with lots of power when you scream it.Nippier handling.To be lower and more uncomfortable than the Fazer after some time in the saddle.What other +’s and –‘s am I missing out here. Expecting an obvious Fazer bias here but hit me with it non the less.Insurance is fine, I’ve got that covered. I don’t tour, I’m a bit of a weekend warrior + very occasional commute tbh.
Get into 2nd and accelerate hard, then close the throttle, let it slow and then accelerate hard again. If there's anything issues, it'll probably pop out of gear. As to the differences, it'll be a lot quicker but missing some low down power, it'll brake and handle much nicer too. Only issues though will be less miles to the gallon, and they're not good for pillion. Riding position is actually quite comfortable, or it is for me. That said, being 20 I find most things comfortable, although I do actuallyprefer sport bike dpositions, as upright bikes give me back ache. Once you get used to it you'll be able to hammer it hard, well worth getting the suspension set up as a minimum, and if you've the money I'd possibly go the whole hog and get your stock stuff revalved and springed for your weight and riding style. Would definitely think about a steering damper though, they're quite powerful and very little, and accelerating over bumpy ground will be a tad twitchy, to say the least0!