most owners will praise their own bikes, so always beware of opinions... both models really will want some modifications from stock.Neither fulfill their full potential without them. but broadly speaking the gen1 is a softer torquey bike with good ergos, the gen2 firmer susssies, worse seat , top end biased power.Best selling point of an FZ-1 now is they are dirt cheap second hand for the power potential they can give. You can of course buy them still new, but its 10k, so lots of alternatives at that price.
Mines a 57 plate, de-catted, end can,power commander,airbox mod,k and n filter,trimmed flies,, holy hell, i just rode it back from a meet, yahoooo
The later gen II bikes ecu was improved. 2010 onwards the torque has been increased low down, and there is no snatchyness/flat spots. I love it, and if your still riding like a sports biker, then the gen II is for you for power and handling. It's comfy enough, and 130-140 ish tank range isn't that bad. The gen I handling might disappoint you after a gixer, and you'll be wanting uprated suspension immediately. Both brilliant bikes, just in their own way. Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
... You can of course buy them still new, but its 10k, so lots of alternatives at that price.
Agreed on most counts, but I generally hit reserve after about 110, so I've never tried pushing the tank range anywhere near 130-140 ... as I don't like pushing!
Quote from: Janet on 02 June 2013, 08:26:07 amAgreed on most counts, but I generally hit reserve after about 110, so I've never tried pushing the tank range anywhere near 130-140 ... as I don't like pushing! Yep, mine hits reserve at about 110, but you can easily go to 130 - 140, the reserve is about 4 litres! And when I fuel up I rarely put over 14 litres in. (18 litre tank?) Have a look at my fuelly figures and you'll see.Sent from my AT300 using Tapatalk 2