I could get riled but judging by the posts it'd be pointless.My wife told be to stop being stroppy too.If you don't like my awesomely,brilliant and wonderful suggestion then I'll learn my lesson from it.I suppose I should thank BBB for teaching me a valuable life lesson that funny is most definitely in the eye of the beholder which (in retrospect) certainly explains little Britain for me too (and don't even get me started on the attractions of soap operas). Thank you BBB, lesson learnt I'll stfu.
Got to ask while Im here.... why did you type f**king instead of fucking? Youre either swearing or your not, you cant part swear!!
Until this thread descended into the gutter it rarely seemed necessary, but I'd now be happy to see some rules along the lines suggested. Those employing profanity with such exuberance here may regard themselves as Malcolm Tuckers, yet it mostly comes across as puerile and lowers the tone of the place.The use of the synonym for vulva is particularly unpleasant.Choosing to use offensive language has nothing to do with free speech, leaving it out is simply a matter of respect towards others. On a public forum it's pretty much akin to screaming obscenities in the street. I'd rather those so inarticulate that they have to use abusive language towards someone to get their point across did so in a private message.
Might be pointless, but its fun!!! Got to ask while Im here.... why did you type f**king instead of fucking? Youre either swearing or your not, you cant part swear!!
Could the site admins possibly help here?On a few other forums I use, there is a self-censorship option that you can set, meaning you can replace any word you're uncomfortable with, with another word of your choice.i.e. shit can be shoot, fuck can be flip, piss can be pee and Hyosung can be wankbag.There are other forums that censor words for all users, but these personal options seem the best so would it be possible to adopt it here?
That might make some people incomprehensible!
"Hyosung can be wankbag"LMAO BRILLIANT!!!
Quote from: Exupnut on 02 July 2013, 10:11:11 am"Hyosung can be wankbag"LMAO BRILLIANT!!!And "blue Fazer Thou" can be "snail"!!
That's a great suggestion - however there's a problem. The 'censored words' option is used to changed some youtube addresses otherwise they wouldn't work, so for those people who didn't have censorship switched on, some youtube videos would not work. It took me a while to figure out how to fix the problem before finally finding this option (I mention this to show I'm not just being lazy).
Quote from: Farjo on 02 July 2013, 10:50:58 amThat's a great suggestion - however there's a problem. The 'censored words' option is used to changed some youtube addresses otherwise they wouldn't work, so for those people who didn't have censorship switched on, some youtube videos would not work. It took me a while to figure out how to fix the problem before finally finding this option (I mention this to show I'm not just being lazy).Oh well, worth a shot.
Quote from: mr self destruct on 02 July 2013, 11:51:25 amQuote from: Farjo on 02 July 2013, 10:50:58 amThat's a great suggestion - however there's a problem. The 'censored words' option is used to changed some youtube addresses otherwise they wouldn't work, so for those people who didn't have censorship switched on, some youtube videos would not work. It took me a while to figure out how to fix the problem before finally finding this option (I mention this to show I'm not just being lazy).Oh well, worth a shot. From a technology perspective it wouldn't be that hard to differentiate between normal text and a URL and apply the conditional formatting appropriately.
Quote from: simonm on 02 July 2013, 12:44:49 pmQuote from: mr self destruct on 02 July 2013, 11:51:25 amQuote from: Farjo on 02 July 2013, 10:50:58 amThat's a great suggestion - however there's a problem. The 'censored words' option is used to changed some youtube addresses otherwise they wouldn't work, so for those people who didn't have censorship switched on, some youtube videos would not work. It took me a while to figure out how to fix the problem before finally finding this option (I mention this to show I'm not just being lazy).Oh well, worth a shot. From a technology perspective it wouldn't be that hard to differentiate between normal text and a URL and apply the conditional formatting appropriately.I'm sure you're right. If you'd like to write the mod then I'll be happy to test it. Or maybe you meant that I should spend my time working on a coding fix on your behalf?
Seems like a lot of work as the general consensus was the forum works well and didn't need fixing. Would it not be easier just to block users that he doesn't like.