Twisted again for fucks sake........you couldn't make this shit up. Now you're back peddling....REPUGNANT !!!! You are a waste of space fella.
CCTV footage aired at the inquest showed SA74 heading towards Masood before moving backwards in an attempt to give the attacker a chance to stop before he opened fire. The officer, who wept while giving testimony, said he shouted at Masood to drop the knife but it had no effect. “He was going to kill me,” he said.His colleague, known only as SB73, told the inquest he shouted warnings at the attacker, but Masood did not change direction or speed and carried on towards them. He said he could not think of a greater justification for having to fire.Both protection officers quickly carried out first aid on Masood after he was shot. The inquest heard three gunshot wounds were found during an autopsy. The first bullet, which struck his upper torso, was believed to be the cause of death.
You literally just shot yourself in the foot
Quote from: mtread on 03 March 2019, 02:33:53 pmThe purpose of reduced sentences is to encourage rehabilitation and remorse. I agree, for the worst murders this is not going to happen. In those cases life must mean life, and it mustn't be pleasant.Now not having ever spent more than one night in a police station, I really don’t have any experiences of incarceration. My understanding was that criminals do not go into prison to be punished, but that the removal of their liberty was indeed the punishment, and ideally come out a reformed person.But for premeditated murder, and I think anyone going out carrying a knife I think premeditation is infered, a life sentence should be a minimum of 25 - 30 years. For someone who has killed more than once it should be their natural life.
The purpose of reduced sentences is to encourage rehabilitation and remorse. I agree, for the worst murders this is not going to happen. In those cases life must mean life, and it mustn't be pleasant.
QuoteAs I said before, the police should've done things American style Fire a dozen bullets into any black person they don't like the look of? Hmmmmm.
As I said before, the police should've done things American style
Throw in that any attempts to act on the problem will be taken as an assault on this/that or the other community/ethnic group, all with their own lobby groups within govt/parliament.
No, he's not saying that is he. Shame on you.
the police should've done things American style
Where an individual, regardless of colour/race/sexual orientation/handedness, has half hacked off the head of another person in the public domain, and is continuing to hack off the remainder of the connection with a very sharp implement, the responsible authority has the approval to terminate said assailant to prevent further loss/injury to other citizens.
Further in the Lee Rigby case the police defended themselves, used appropriate force and made arrests. They did not act as judge, jury and executioners as Darrsi would have them.
QuoteNo, he's not saying that is he. Shame on you.What he said was;Quotethe police should've done things American styleWhich is open to interpretationQuoteWhere an individual, regardless of colour/race/sexual orientation/handedness, has half hacked off the head of another person in the public domain, and is continuing to hack off the remainder of the connection with a very sharp implement, the responsible authority has the approval to terminate said assailant to prevent further loss/injury to other citizens.Which is your interpretation. And in any case you are wrong. The police have the right to use reasonable and appropriate force to protect themselves and the public. They do not have a license to kill.
"Open to interpretation" - but only your interpretation is the right one. Feckin priceless
the responsible authority has the approval to terminate said assailant to prevent further loss/injury to other citizens.
OK. Xenophobic then.QuoteMaybe the odd argumentative prick from Scotland, you could be right there. Dunno why that came oot sae large.
Maybe the odd argumentative prick from Scotland, you could be right there.
A simple yes or no to my original post would have been good wasn't looking for a debate about who/why it's committed, but how do we stop or control it. Is it just humans who are capable of killing for other reasons than food.
you talk about them being judge, jury and executioner.... You truly haven't got a clue.
Quote from: dazza on 05 March 2019, 01:25:38 PM you talk about them being judge, jury and executioner.... You truly haven't got a clue. Perhaps you should ask Jean Charles de Menezes' opinion on that. Or maybe the police who lied and *lied* and LIED to try to cover up the fact that they *MURDERED* an innocent man... But, I'm sure you'll claim that that was different from shooting someone who may be mentally ill or wants to commit "suicide by cop"...
VNA I might be making a habit of this but I agree with you about the officer actions in the Lee Rigby that pair of low life are better in prison having to watch their backs every time they step out their cells one day prison officers wont be on hand to protect them.
Anyway......... knife crime, what's the solution?
Quote Anyway......... knife crime, what's the solution? Umm sorry aboot tha. I guess what some of youse foccers are goin tae huv tae geit yer heids roond is that extreme deterrents such as stringing offenders up, or judge, jury and executioner police tactics, short sharp shock and national service or whatever. None of them work and if anything will just make matters worse. Yes, they are crowd pleasing, create attention grabbing headlines and make good macho pish talk doon the pub, but that’s about it.Afraid if you want results, you’re gonna have tae look at some of the so called do-gooder, wet behind the ears liberal leftie community project approaches. A la Boston and Glasgow VRU initiatives. They have a proven track record of delivering results. Maybe with luck London and England as a whole can learn new tricks along these lines to the benefit of all. In the short term a police crackdown, stop and search, along with a knife amnesty will help, but without the long-term investment in your communities, which is sadly lacking, you’ll be onto plums.
Think you'll find that stringing them up will 100% stop them from reoffending.